From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@linux.intel.com,
bcasavan@sgi.com, airlied@linux.ie, grundler@parisc-linux.org,
perex@perex.cz, rpurdie@rpsys.net,
klassert@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de, tj@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Fix various section mismatches and build errors.
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:24:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309368276.13937.2.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110629161921.GA25833@linux-mips.org>
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 17:19 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:14:24AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:58:19AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > I think we should simply concentrate on __init and __exit; that's where
> > > most of the discard value lies and stop expending huge efforts on the
> > > __devX stuff which adds huge complexity for no real gain.
> >
> > I have long felt that those __devX markings should just go away as they
> > cause nothing but problems and have no real gain as you point out.
>
> The suggestion to do that has been floated around before but seems to
> have missed sufficient thrust. I'm all for it; the manual tagging with
> __devX has not been very efficient on developer time. I just want to see
> meaningful warnings again over all that noise the current mechanisn may
> produce.
For me, just go ahead and fix the actual problems: so _init sections and
_exit sections that are used from the main body, just strip the
annotations, don't try to change them for _devX ones.
Thanks,
James
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-29 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-26 11:19 [PATCH 00/12] Fix various section mismatches and build errors Ralf Baechle
2011-06-27 13:26 ` [PATCH 10/12] SERIAL: SC26xx: Fix link error Ralf Baechle
2011-06-28 8:25 ` Alan Cox
2011-06-28 5:12 ` [PATCH 00/12] Fix various section mismatches and build errors David Miller
2011-06-29 13:07 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-29 13:58 ` James Bottomley
2011-06-29 15:14 ` Greg KH
2011-06-29 16:19 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-29 17:24 ` James Bottomley [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1309368276.13937.2.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bcasavan@sgi.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=klassert@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).