From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next 0/9] tty: Fix buffer work access-after-free
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 02:07:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1354604865-10278-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
This patch series addresses the causes of flush_to_ldisc accessing
the tty after freeing.
The most common cause stems from the n_tty_close() path spuriously
scheduling buffer work, when the ldisc has already been halted.
This is fixed in 'tty: Don't reschedule buffer work while closing'
The other causes have a central theme: incorrect order-of-operations
when halting a line discipline. In general, to prevent buffer work
from being scheduled requires:
1. Disallowing further ldisc references
2. Waiting for all existing ldisc references to be released
3. Cancelling existing buffer work
If the wait takes place _after_ cancellation, then new work
can be scheduled by existing holder(s) of ldisc reference(s). That's
bad.
Halting the line discipline is performed when,
- hanging up the tty (tty_ldisc_hangup())
- TIOCSETD ioctl (tty_set_ldisc())
- finally closing the tty (pair) (tty_ldisc_release())
Concurrent halts are governed by the following requirements:
1. tty_ldisc_release is not concurrent with the other two and so
does not need lock or state protection during the ldiscs halt.
2. Accesses through tty->ldisc must be protected by the ldisc_mutex.
The wait operation checks the user count (ldisc references)
in tty->ldisc->users.
3. tty_set_ldisc() reschedules buffer work that was pending when
the ldiscs were halted. That must be an atomic operation in
conjunction with re-enabling the ldisc -- which necessitates
locking concurrent halts (tty_ldisc_release is exempt here)
4. The legacy mutex cannot be held while waiting for ldisc
reference(s) release -or- for cancelling buffer work.
5. Because of #4, the legacy mutex must be dropped prior to or
during the halt. Which means reacquiring after the halt. But
to preserve lock order the ldisc_mutex must be dropped and
reacquired after reacquiring the legacy mutex.
6. Because of #5, the ldisc state may have changed while the
ldisc mutex was dropped.
Note: this series does not include the lock correction initially
reported on by Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/21/267 . I commented on the latest
version here https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/3/362
This series also does not include Jiri's debug patch here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/2/278 for identifying which itty cleanup
path is used. I think it may be helpful to include this in -next.
Peter Hurley (9):
tty: WARN if buffer work racing with tty free
tty: Add diagnostic for halted line discipline
tty: Don't reschedule buffer work while closing
tty: Refactor wait for ldisc refs out of tty_ldisc_hangup()
tty: Remove unnecessary re-test of ldisc ref count
tty: Fix ldisc halt sequence on hangup
tty: Strengthen no-subsequent-use guarantee of tty_ldisc_halt()
tty: Remove unnecessary buffer work flush
tty: Halt both ldiscs concurrently
drivers/tty/n_tty.c | 8 ++-
drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c | 3 +
drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 2 +
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
include/linux/tty.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
--
1.8.0
next reply other threads:[~2012-12-04 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 7:07 Peter Hurley [this message]
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 1/9] tty: WARN if buffer work racing with tty free Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 2/9] tty: Add diagnostic for halted line discipline Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 3/9] tty: Don't reschedule buffer work while closing Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 4/9] tty: Refactor wait for ldisc refs out of tty_ldisc_hangup() Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 5/9] tty: Remove unnecessary re-test of ldisc ref count Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 6/9] tty: Fix ldisc halt sequence on hangup Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 7/9] tty: Strengthen no-subsequent-use guarantee of tty_ldisc_halt() Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 8/9] tty: Remove unnecessary buffer work flush Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 9/9] tty: Halt both ldiscs concurrently Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:40 ` [PATCH -next 0/9] tty: Fix buffer work access-after-free Ilya Zykov
2012-12-04 8:54 ` Alan Cox
2012-12-04 13:58 ` Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 14:30 ` Alan Cox
2012-12-04 9:38 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-12-07 0:57 ` Peter Hurley
2012-12-10 19:00 ` Ilya Zykov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1354604865-10278-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).