From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next 5/9] tty: Remove unnecessary re-test of ldisc ref count
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 02:07:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1354604865-10278-6-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354604865-10278-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Since the tty->ldisc is prevented from being changed by tty_set_ldisc()
when a tty is being hung up, re-testing the ldisc user count is
unnecessary -- ie, it cannot be a different ldisc and the user count
cannot have increased (assuming the caller meets the precondition that
TTY_LDISC flag is cleared)
Removal of the 'early-out' locking optimization is necessary for
the subsequent patch 'tty: Fix ldisc halt sequence on hangup'.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index 6c1d8aa..0d18d1e 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -556,29 +556,29 @@ static int tty_ldisc_halt(struct tty_struct *tty)
* have been halted for this to guarantee it remains idle.
*
* Caller must hold legacy and ->ldisc_mutex.
+ *
+ * NB: tty_set_ldisc() is prevented from changing the ldisc concurrently
+ * with this function when it checks the TTY_HUPPING state.
*/
static bool tty_ldisc_hangup_wait_idle(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
- while (tty->ldisc) { /* Not yet closed */
- if (atomic_read(&tty->ldisc->users) != 1) {
- char cur_n[TASK_COMM_LEN], tty_n[64];
- long timeout = 3 * HZ;
- tty_unlock(tty);
-
- while (tty_ldisc_wait_idle(tty, timeout) == -EBUSY) {
- timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
- printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
- "%s: waiting (%s) for %s took too long, but we keep waiting...\n",
- __func__, get_task_comm(cur_n, current),
- tty_name(tty, tty_n));
- }
- /* must reacquire both locks and preserve lock order */
- mutex_unlock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
- tty_lock(tty);
- mutex_lock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
- continue;
+ char cur_n[TASK_COMM_LEN], tty_n[64];
+ long timeout = 3 * HZ;
+
+ if (tty->ldisc) { /* Not yet closed */
+ tty_unlock(tty);
+
+ while (tty_ldisc_wait_idle(tty, timeout) == -EBUSY) {
+ timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
+ printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
+ "%s: waiting (%s) for %s took too long, but we keep waiting...\n",
+ __func__, get_task_comm(cur_n, current),
+ tty_name(tty, tty_n));
}
- break;
+ /* must reacquire both locks and preserve lock order */
+ mutex_unlock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
+ tty_lock(tty);
+ mutex_lock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
}
return !!(tty->ldisc);
}
--
1.8.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-04 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 7:07 [PATCH -next 0/9] tty: Fix buffer work access-after-free Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 1/9] tty: WARN if buffer work racing with tty free Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 2/9] tty: Add diagnostic for halted line discipline Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 3/9] tty: Don't reschedule buffer work while closing Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 4/9] tty: Refactor wait for ldisc refs out of tty_ldisc_hangup() Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 6/9] tty: Fix ldisc halt sequence on hangup Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 7/9] tty: Strengthen no-subsequent-use guarantee of tty_ldisc_halt() Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 8/9] tty: Remove unnecessary buffer work flush Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 9/9] tty: Halt both ldiscs concurrently Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:40 ` [PATCH -next 0/9] tty: Fix buffer work access-after-free Ilya Zykov
2012-12-04 8:54 ` Alan Cox
2012-12-04 13:58 ` Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 14:30 ` Alan Cox
2012-12-04 9:38 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-12-07 0:57 ` Peter Hurley
2012-12-10 19:00 ` Ilya Zykov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1354604865-10278-6-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).