From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>, Ilya Zykov <ilya@ilyx.ru>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/9] tty: Fix buffer work access-after-free
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 08:58:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1354629480.475.7.camel@thor> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121204085426.389ca79b@bob.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 08:54 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 02:07:36 -0500
> Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> wrote:
>
> > This patch series addresses the causes of flush_to_ldisc accessing
> > the tty after freeing.
>
> Looks good to me. Would be nice to keep a copy of the test that shows
> it up in the comments of the patches somewhere.
I assume you mean somewhere other than ml archives:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/1/57
Setting up a mini-testsuite is good idea. As I noted in that email
though, that test jig is a derivative work that I'd want a ok from Ilya
Zykov to put somewhere more permanent.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-04 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 7:07 [PATCH -next 0/9] tty: Fix buffer work access-after-free Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 1/9] tty: WARN if buffer work racing with tty free Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 2/9] tty: Add diagnostic for halted line discipline Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 3/9] tty: Don't reschedule buffer work while closing Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 4/9] tty: Refactor wait for ldisc refs out of tty_ldisc_hangup() Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 5/9] tty: Remove unnecessary re-test of ldisc ref count Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 6/9] tty: Fix ldisc halt sequence on hangup Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 7/9] tty: Strengthen no-subsequent-use guarantee of tty_ldisc_halt() Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 8/9] tty: Remove unnecessary buffer work flush Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:07 ` [PATCH -next 9/9] tty: Halt both ldiscs concurrently Peter Hurley
2012-12-04 7:40 ` [PATCH -next 0/9] tty: Fix buffer work access-after-free Ilya Zykov
2012-12-04 8:54 ` Alan Cox
2012-12-04 13:58 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2012-12-04 14:30 ` Alan Cox
2012-12-04 9:38 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-12-07 0:57 ` Peter Hurley
2012-12-10 19:00 ` Ilya Zykov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1354629480.475.7.camel@thor \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ilya@ilyx.ru \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).