From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: markh@compro.net
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Mark Hounschell <dmarkh@cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Out of tree GPL serial tty driver help?
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:37:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366994272.689.4.camel@thor.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <517A8EF1.8040006@compro.net>
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 10:28 -0400, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> On 04/26/2013 09:45 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 08:58 -0400, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> >> On 04/25/2013 05:41 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 13:44 -0400, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> >>>> I've been sort of maintaining a couple of Digi International serial port
> >>>> card (XP and AP) drivers for years now because, well, they just won't do
> >>>> it anymore. In any case, I'm moving from a 3.4.x kernel, that works just
> >>>> fine, to a 3.8.8 kernel, that does not. I have code that does something
> >>>> like this:
> >>>>
> >>>> tty_set_operations(&SerialDriver, &SerialOps);
> >>>> tty_register_driver(&SerialDriver);
> >>>> maxminor = NumBoards * 64;
> >>>> for (i = 0; i < maxminor; i++)
> >>>> tty_register_device(&SerialDriver, i, NULL);
> >>>
> >>> You're correct in diagnosing the problem to cdevs == NULL.
> >>> You're missing:
> >>>
> >>> maxminor = min(num_boards * 64, 256);
> >>> serial_driver = alloc_tty_driver(maxminor);
> >>>
> >>> then,
> >>> /* Fill in pertinent tty_driver fields, esp. */
> >>> serial_driver->flags = TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV;
> >>>
> >>> tty_set_operations(serial_driver, &serial_ops);
> >>> tty_register_driver(serial_driver);
> >>> for (i = 0; i < maxminor; i++)
> >>> tty_register_device(serial_driver, i, NULL);
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Thanks for responding Peter.
> >>
> >> Earlier in the code they do this:
> >>
> >> static struct tty_driver SerialDriver
> >> and things like
> >> SerialDriver.termios = kmalloc((maxminor - 256) * sizeof(TERMIOS *),
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > is this a transcription error?
>
> Yes, sorry. (MIN(maxminor,256) * sizeof(TERMIOS *)
Ok.
> >
> >> GFP_KERNEL);
> >>
> >> So is the above no longer going to work and I _must_ now use
> >> alloc_tty_driver?
> >
> > Not required but functionally equivalent. alloc_tty_driver() is actually
> > a wrapper macro which calls __tty_alloc_driver(). You can verify your
> > driver behavior against that function, if you want.
> >
> >> If alloc_tty_driver is now a requirement, how much is
> >> it going to do for me? There are several things like the termios above
> >> that are manually allocated. How much if any of this is alloc_tty_driver
> >> going to do for me?
> >
> > I can't answer this because I don't know what else your open-coded
> > method is doing.
> >
>
> Looking at __tty_alloc_driver, it looks as though only driver, cdevs and
> ports are provided.
>
> >> or might this work
> >>
> >> static struct tty_driver SerialDriver
> >> .
> >> .
> >> .
> >> serial_driver.flags = TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV;
> >>
> >> SerialDriver.cdevs = kcalloc(maxminor,
> >> sizeof(SerialDriver.cdevs), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> So might something like the above for cdevs and ports get me where I
> need to be?
>
> >>
> >> tty_set_operations(&serial_driver, &serial_ops);
> >> tty_register_driver(&serial_driver);
> >> for (i = 0; i < maxminor; i++)
> >> tty_register_device(&serial_driver, i, NULL);
> >>
> >> ???
> >>
> >>>
> >>> PS - Each board supports 64 individual serial ports??
> >>
> >> No, this particular card comes in 4, 8, and 16 port flavors. I never did
> >> understand why they create so many device entries. I just figured they
> >> had a reason. For a single card, no matter how many ports, they create
> >> 64 normal serial tty entries (tty_dgdm_G0 - tty_dgdm_G63), 64 serial
> >> printer entries (lp_dgdm_G0 - lp_dgdm_G63), and then 64 serial modem
> >> entries (cu_dgdm_G0 - cu_dgdm_G63). Don't know why.
> >
> > So where does i/o go for tty_dgdm_G16?
> >
>
> I have no idea. I do know that G0 - G7 are the ones I actually use for
> ports 0-7 of an 8 port card-0, and
> G64 - G71 are the ones I use for ports 0-7 of an 8 port card-1. I
> remember long ago I had some doc explaining this but can't seem to find
> it now.
>
> > Also, what host bus are these cards for?
> >
>
> This particular driver and one other are normal PCI based cards. I also
> have one other that is PCI-e. This particular one is the only one that
> creates all these weird device entries. The other 2 are pretty straight
> forward. One entry per port. I figured I'd tackle this one first.
Ok. Looking at Digi's website, I see they have external port
concentrators. That would explain the fixed 64-port allocation (although
that's not really how to do it).
These drivers weren't really current at 3.4 though, either. I'm not sure
what else you're going to find that doesn't work.
For both PCI and PCI-e, these drivers should _at a minimum_ be pci
drivers that register the tty driver at module init and register _only_
the tty devices for that particular PCI device at PCI probe time. Look
at the end of synclink_gt.c for how this is supposed to look.
Good luck,
Peter Hurley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-26 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 17:44 Out of tree GPL serial tty driver help? Mark Hounschell
2013-04-25 21:41 ` Peter Hurley
2013-04-26 12:58 ` Mark Hounschell
2013-04-26 13:45 ` Peter Hurley
2013-04-26 14:28 ` Mark Hounschell
2013-04-26 14:35 ` Greg KH
2013-04-26 15:10 ` Mark Hounschell
2013-04-26 15:19 ` Greg KH
2013-04-26 15:39 ` Peter Hurley
2013-04-26 16:03 ` Greg KH
2013-04-26 17:58 ` Mark Hounschell
2013-04-26 23:21 ` Greg KH
2013-04-26 16:37 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2013-04-26 18:17 ` Mark Hounschell
2013-04-26 19:51 ` Peter Hurley
2013-04-26 20:26 ` Mark Hounschell
2013-04-26 21:49 ` Peter Hurley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1366994272.689.4.camel@thor.lan \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=dmarkh@cfl.rr.com \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markh@compro.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).