From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build failure Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 07:06:47 -0800 Message-ID: <1452697607.8586.6.camel@perches.com> References: <1452363335-2535-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <20160109182908.GB29967@kroah.com> <20160111083536.GB8070@sudip-pc> <20160111111101.GA18945@roeck-us.net> <5693C553.7050400@windriver.com> <5695E207.9080309@roeck-us.net> <1452663850.8586.3.camel@perches.com> <20160113103246.GB26117@sudip-pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160113103246.GB26117@sudip-pc> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sudip Mukherjee Cc: Guenter Roeck , Paul Gortmaker , postmaster , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Nicolas Ferre , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 16:02 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:44:10PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: [] > > > Sudip, one option would be to set up a semi-private mailing list. > > > My build tests now have a dedicated virtual host (kerneltests.org). > > > I could set up a managed list there. > > > > Perhaps it'd be better to have something like linux-build-failures@vger.kernel.org > > yes, much better. But if me and Guenter are the only two members of that > list then it will not look nice. :) Likely kbuild-robot output would use it. That would be better than bcc'ing lkml.