From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] dmaengine: slave means at least one of DMA_SLAVE, DMA_CYCLIC Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 20:43:34 +0300 Message-ID: <1462902214-64706-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Vinod Koul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Peter Hurley , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andy Shevchenko List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org When check for capabilities recognize slave support by either DMA_SLAVE or DMA_CYCLIC bit set. If we don't do that the user can't get a normally worked DMA support for engines that doesn't have one of the mentioned bits set. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- In v2: - fix typo in the commit message - send patch separately drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c index 5ff79a0..59eb4fa 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c @@ -482,8 +482,8 @@ int dma_get_slave_caps(struct dma_chan *chan, struct dma_slave_caps *caps) device = chan->device; /* check if the channel supports slave transactions */ - if ((!test_bit(DMA_SLAVE, device->cap_mask.bits)) || - (!test_bit(DMA_CYCLIC, device->cap_mask.bits))) + if (!(test_bit(DMA_SLAVE, device->cap_mask.bits) || + test_bit(DMA_CYCLIC, device->cap_mask.bits))) return -ENXIO; /* -- 2.8.1