From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Long Cheng Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dmaengine: 8250_mtk_dma: add MediaTek uart DMA support Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 18:18:54 +0800 Message-ID: <1545819534.28871.93.camel@mhfsdcap03> References: <1545701209-6884-1-git-send-email-long.cheng@mediatek.com> <1545701209-6884-2-git-send-email-long.cheng@mediatek.com> <1545739611.28871.77.camel@mhfsdcap03> <1545806121.28871.88.camel@mhfsdcap03> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Boichat Cc: Vinod Koul , Randy Dunlap , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Ryder Lee , Sean Wang , Matthias Brugger , Dan Williams , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Sean Wang , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm Mailing List , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, lkml , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Yingjoe Chen , YT Shen , Z List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2018-12-26 at 17:28 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote: ...... > > > > > > +static int mtk_uart_apdma_device_pause(struct dma_chan *chan) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + /* just for check caps pass */ > > > > > > + return 0; > > > > > > +} > > > > > > + > > > > > > +static int mtk_uart_apdma_device_resume(struct dma_chan *chan) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + /* just for check caps pass */ > > > > > > + return 0; > > > > > > +} > > > > > > Why do you need these? Seems wrong to advertise device_pause/resume > > > (and the caps) if we don't actually support that? > > > > > > > in serial 8250_dma.c file, when request DMA, will calll > > 'dma_get_slave_caps' to get the caps. and the will check caps.cmd_pause. > > the pause is device_pause. our device can't support the functions. but > > to check pass, need add the fake function. or you can give better > > comments. thanks. > > Well, then I guess this is a hack... I'm not too familiar with > 8250_dma.c, but I guess that if it requires pause/resume to be > implemented, then we should implement them, not just stub them out... > > Is this something that can be implemented with 8250_mtk DMA? > the HW can't support it. > Also, I don't see where you need resume, so maybe implementing pause is enough? > yes. pause is enough. for symmetry, add resume function. anyway, the pause function need to keep. > > > > > > + > > > > > > +static void mtk_uart_apdma_free(struct mtk_uart_apdmadev *mtkd) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + while (list_empty(&mtkd->ddev.channels) == 0) { > > > > > > + struct mtk_chan *c = list_first_entry(&mtkd->ddev.channels, > > > > > > + struct mtk_chan, vc.chan.device_node); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + list_del(&c->vc.chan.device_node); > > > > > > + tasklet_kill(&c->vc.task); > > > > > > + } > > > > > > +} > > > > > > + > > > > > > +static const struct of_device_id mtk_uart_apdma_match[] = { > > > > > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6577-uart-dma", }, > > > > > > + { /* sentinel */ }, > > > > > > +}; > > > > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_uart_apdma_match); > > > > > > + > > > > > > +static int mtk_uart_apdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + struct mtk_uart_apdmadev *mtkd; > > > > > > + struct resource *res; > > > > > > + struct mtk_chan *c; > > > > > > + unsigned int i; > > > > > > + int rc; > > > > > > + ......