From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.30: [SERIAL] build fails at 8250.c Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 09:05:23 +0100 Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20020803090523.A22424@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <200208030020.RAA05695@baldur.yggdrasil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208030020.RAA05695@baldur.yggdrasil.com>; from adam@yggdrasil.com on Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 05:20:28PM -0700 List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: "Adam J. Richter" Cc: axel@hh59.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 05:20:28PM -0700, Adam J. Richter wrote: > On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 01:12:10 +0100, Russell King wrote: > >Ok, here's a fix for the 8250.c build problem (please don't send it > >to Linus; I've other changes that'll be going via BK and patch to > >lkml pending): > > > >--- orig/drivers/serial/8250.c Fri Aug 2 21:13:31 2002 > >+++ linux/drivers/serial/8250.c Sat Aug 3 00:28:47 2002 > >@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > >-#include > >+#include > >+#include > > #include > > > > #include > > Your patch still results in a compilation error for me. > It looks like 8250.c needs for ALPHA_KLUDGE_MCR: Your quote above didn't include the patch for 8250.h which was in my mail directly after 8250.c. Did you specifically miss it for a reason? -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html