From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: Heads Up: Next Batch Of Serial/TTY Changes Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:16:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20070831231613.6b0fcdfd@the-village.bc.nu> References: <20070831221105.2fce9023@the-village.bc.nu> <20070831.144115.48807246.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [81.2.110.250] ([81.2.110.250]:38140 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750762AbXHaWHp (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:07:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070831.144115.48807246.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote: > From: Alan Cox > Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:11:05 +0100 > > > Firstly some architecture maintainers still haven't updated their > > platform for arbitary tty speeds. The kernel is going to start whining > > and issuing warnings on your platform if you don't keep up with the > > programme (its been 6 months). > > I took a look at this for sparc and I'm currently balking the same way > you did :-) The current bit usage on sparc just don't work properly > for what you're trying to do. I don't see a real problem. You aren't using c_cflags & CBAUD = 0x00001000 so that could become BOTHER. the input bits also appear to be reserved and free ?