From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jay Cliburn Subject: Re: 2.6.25.3: serial problem (minicom) Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 10:10:26 -0500 Message-ID: <20080517101026.270a6f4e@osprey.hogchain.net> References: <20080517082207.4b1e8556@osprey.hogchain.net> <543631.10570.qm@web52902.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fmailhost05.isp.att.net ([207.115.11.55]:58801 "EHLO fmailhost01.isp.att.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754979AbYEQPKe (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2008 11:10:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <543631.10570.qm@web52902.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Rankin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 17 May 2008 15:49:08 +0100 (BST) Chris Rankin wrote: > Does yours still work if you raise the baud rate to 115200? No, but I also get garbage characters and a generally unusable logging device. 57600 is slightly better, but not much. I remember going through this progressive reduction in baud rate a long time ago, trying to find a speed that works reliably, which is why I settled on 38400. I get unpredictable results for anything higher.