From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Benjamin Krill <ben@codiert.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial: add support for the cell network processor NWP device
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:11:21 +0100
Message-ID: <20090107081120.GB3306@codiert.org>
References: <200811241453.32166.arnd@arndb.de> <1231297694.14860.55.camel@pasglop> <20090106202143.b31b908e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from cursor.subgra.de ([78.46.252.50]:32897 "EHLO cursor.subgra.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752547AbZAGInw (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 7 Jan 2009 03:43:52 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090106202143.b31b908e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

>My version is mucked up anyway - PORT_NWPSERIAL has the same value as
>PORT_S3C6400.

Should I send an updated version against a current tree? 

 ben