From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: quirks, don't mark one netmos as class other Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:17:26 -0800 Message-ID: <200902090917.26450.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> References: <1228749555-21363-1-git-send-email-jirislaby@gmail.com> <498F558F.109@gmail.com> <20090208144537.ecf1019b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090208144537.ecf1019b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Jiri Slaby , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, February 8, 2009 2:45 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:58:39 +0100 Jiri Slaby wrote: > > Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > On Monday, December 08, 2008 7:19 am Jiri Slaby wrote: > > >> Let it as serial, since it doesn't have subdevice in the form of > > >> 0x00PS. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby > > >> Cc: Jesse Barnes > > > > > > Applied to my linux-next branch, thanks. > > > > Hi, did this get lost by a chance? I don't see it in your -next branch > > anymore. Neither in any other branch nor upstream. > > > > BTW I got: > > This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem > > tree from Andrew, so it had to be somewhere, I suppose... > > yes, it got lost. I resurrected it. Sorry I must have been thinking about another patch when I replied; the contents don't look familiar. Anyway I'll pick it up now. Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center