From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Give the N_AMSDELTA line discipline more generic name Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:47:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20090807104753.GA9002@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <200908061306.27639.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:47303 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757322AbZHGKry (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:47:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200908061306.27639.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Janusz Krzysztofik Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , e3-hacking@earth.li, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:06:26PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > As the line discipline is conceived to be registered from a machine driver, > there should be no conflicts, even if used by several different drivers that > happen to be be built-in side-by-side. I've applied the patches but squashed them down into one to avoid broken builds when doing bisection.