From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial/mpc52xx_uart: Drop outdated comments Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 01:59:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20100401235901.GC13989@pengutronix.de> References: <1262985569-29826-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <20100202185812.GM4757@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:59259 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758991Ab0DAX7D (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:59:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Grant Likely Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org --NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:06:12PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Wolfram Sang wro= te: > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 10:19:29PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Most things mentioned are either obsolete (platform-support) or wrong = (device > >> numbering, DCD spport) these days. The remaining rest is obvious. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > >> Cc: Grant Likely > > > > Ping. Anyone interested in this patch? >=20 > I haven't forgotten, I just haven't gotten around to looking at it. Ping --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAku1M0UACgkQD27XaX1/VRtN6gCfc7c5o4azku7VYxpaWJThkV+P uwQAnjNABqI5pryqh57XBbXV7gPw5sCb =ghqv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU--