From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] BKL pruning and serial bug fixing Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 12:01:52 -0700 Message-ID: <20100520190152.GA26047@kroah.com> References: <20100519120111.16717.71992.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20100520175636.GB17077@kroah.com> <20100520190605.141a70ad@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:39773 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751481Ab0ETTDX (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 15:03:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100520190605.141a70ad@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 07:06:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Thu, 20 May 2010 10:56:36 -0700 > Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:01:42PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > BKL elemination using the existing locks > > > > Hm, have all of these patches been in -next before now? Do you think > > these are ready to go into .35? > > Sorry - you asked for them to be re-sent with the BKL removal fixes from > Arnd which is for .36. They aren't needed for .35 and don't really fix > anything that would be worth backporting either. > > Not .35 material. Ah, good, I just didn't know where to apply them. I'll wait till .35-rc1 is out before queueing them up. thanks, greg k-h