From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] BKL pruning and serial bug fixing Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 19:06:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20100520190605.141a70ad@linux.intel.com> References: <20100519120111.16717.71992.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20100520175636.GB17077@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:8878 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750961Ab0ETSs4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 14:48:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100520175636.GB17077@kroah.com> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 20 May 2010 10:56:36 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:01:42PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > BKL elemination using the existing locks > > Hm, have all of these patches been in -next before now? Do you think > these are ready to go into .35? Sorry - you asked for them to be re-sent with the BKL removal fixes from Arnd which is for .36. They aren't needed for .35 and don't really fix anything that would be worth backporting either. Not .35 material. Alan