linux-serial.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
	gregkh@suse.de, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] TTY: serial_core, fix dtr_rts NULL dereference
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:49:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110325204922.7ed9fd8c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D8CAA0F.9040204@suse.cz>

> > The uart helper layer assumes here (and a couple of other spots) that the
> > IRQ handler for the tty takes the port lock.
> 
> The oopsing path is through open BTW:
> -> uart_open
>  -> tty_port_block_til_ready
>   -> tty_port_raise_dtr_rts
>    -> uart_dtr_rts
> 
> > I think the *right* fix is probably to pass port not port->tty into the
> > helper in the first place but that seems to ripple into a lot of drivers.
> > 
> > (passing port->tty to things that then go tty->port is braindead and
> > causes half the mess in the tty/serial code)
> 
> I seem to miss the point. uart_update_termios needs tty, not port.


Actually I think it needs shooting having looked more closely

It does 3 things

1. It copies a flag across as part of a console hack. That should be done
elsewhere - eg in uart_startup

2. It sets the speed, which was already done by uart_startup

3. It goes poking around in the CBAUD flag before playing with DTR and
RTS which will have no effect as we *already* set the flags in
uart_dtr_rts

Am I missing something ?





  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-25 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-25 10:45 Should .dtr_rts do tty_port_tty_get? Jiri Slaby
2011-03-25 10:45 ` [PATCH 1/1] TTY: serial_core, fix dtr_rts NULL dereference Jiri Slaby
2011-03-25 11:00   ` Alan Cox
2011-03-25 14:43     ` Jiri Slaby
2011-03-25 20:49       ` Alan Cox [this message]
2011-03-29 15:10         ` Jiri Slaby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110325204922.7ed9fd8c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).