From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] TTY: serial, cleanup include file Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 23:25:53 +0000 Message-ID: <20111109232553.5fa24741@bob.linux.org.uk> References: <1320870831-23778-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz> <20111109215901.16f44570@bob.linux.org.uk> <4EBAFA03.40405@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:43676 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752188Ab1KIXOq (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2011 18:14:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4EBAFA03.40405@suse.cz> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Slaby Cc: Jiri Slaby , gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:09:07 +0100 Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 11/09/2011 10:59 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > > We need to move the tty_buffer objects into the tty_port. > > Thanks a lot for reminding me. (I remember you telling me about this > at KS.) So I suppose you prefer this to be done first... OK, I will > look into that. Leaving the rest of the serial stuff apart for the > time being. I'm not really bothered what is done first - it's not as if I am doing the work! I just thought it might be easier to do it that way around rather than adding and removing more complexity on the way ? Alan