From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@linaro.org>,
amit.kucheria@canonical.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
ben-linux@fluff.org, eric.miao@linaro.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
cjb@laptop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
alan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 01/14] clk: add helper functions clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:56:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111111115644.GT16886@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111111102727.GC12913@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:27:27AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:15:56AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 05:05:47PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > {
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > ret = clk_prepare(clk);
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > > ret = clk_enable(clk);
> > > if (ret)
> > > clk_unprepare(clk);
> > > return ret;
> >
> > Yes, looks good.
>
> While this looks like a nice easy solution for converting existing
> drivers, I'd suggest thinking about this a little more...
>
> I would suggest some thought is given to the placement of clk_enable()
> and clk_disable() when adding clk_prepare(), especially if your existing
> clk_enable() function can only be called from non-atomic contexts.
>
> Obviously, the transition path needs to be along these lines:
>
> 1. add clk_prepare() to drivers
> 2. implement clk_prepare() and make clk_enable() callable from non-atomic
> contexts
> 3. move clk_enable() in drivers to places it can be called from non-atomic
> contexts to achieve greater power savings (maybe via the runtime pm)
>
> and where a driver is shared between different sub-architectures which
> have non-atomic clk_enable()s, (3) can only happen when all those sub-
> architectures have been updated to step (2).
The drivers changed here all do clk_prepare/enable in their probe
function. I agree that this clk_prepare_enable patch gives kind of
wrong motivation to just use this function and to forget about
potential power savings with proper integration of clk_prepare/enable.
I think though that it will take a long time until all drivers really
do this no matter if we have such a helper or not. I think that in the
meantime it's better to have a little helper than to clobber the probe
code with additional error handling.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-11 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-11 1:10 [PATCH V2 00/14] add clk_prepare/clk_unprepare to imx drivers Richard Zhao
[not found] ` <1320973829-4388-1-git-send-email-richard.zhao-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 01/14] clk: add helper functions clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 7:28 ` Baruch Siach
2011-11-11 8:49 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-11-11 9:05 ` Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 9:15 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-11-11 10:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-11 11:56 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
[not found] ` <20111111115644.GT16886-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-11-11 14:20 ` Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 03/14] ARM: mxc: ahci: add clk_prepare/clk_unprepare Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 09/14] ARM: mx31moboard: " Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 02/14] ARM: mxc: time: " Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 04/14] ARM: mxc: pwm: " Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 05/14] ARM: mxc: epit: " Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 06/14] ARM: mxc: arch_reset: " Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 07/14] ARM: mxc: audmux-v2: " Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 08/14] ARM: pm-imx5: " Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 10/14] ARM: mxs: " Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 11/14] serial: imx: " Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 12/14] net: fec: " Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 13/14] i2c: imx: " Richard Zhao
2011-11-11 1:10 ` [PATCH V2 14/14] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: " Richard Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111111115644.GT16886@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=amit.kucheria@canonical.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=eric.miao@linaro.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard.zhao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).