From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: patch "tty: serial: OMAP: ensure FIFO levels are set correctly in non-DMA" added to tty tree Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:21:55 -0800 Message-ID: <20120126042155.GA3185@suse.de> References: <13274430881471@kroah.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51266 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751682Ab2AZEXC (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:23:02 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: govindraj.r@ti.com, khilman@ti.com, tomi.valkeinen@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 08:02:09PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > cc lists > > Hi Greg > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, gregkh@suse.de wrote: > > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > tty: serial: OMAP: ensure FIFO levels are set correctly in non-DMA > > > > to my tty git tree which can be found at > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git > > in the tty-linus branch. > > If it's not too late, I was wondering if you could drop this patch and the > subsequent one ("tty: serial: OMAP: transmit FIFO threshold interrupts > don't wake the"), in favor of the second version of this series that was > just posted at > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=132754676814391&w=2 > > If it is too late, we'll deal with it in 3.4. What is wrong with the patches that I applied? How about a fix-up patch on top of what I have applied instead of whole new ones? greg k-h