From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/11] KGDB/KDB FIQ (NMI) debugger Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 05:54:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20120917125427.GA23516@kroah.com> References: <20120913150133.GA16238@lizard> <20120917113750.GA28838@kroah.com> <50571ADF.3000406@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:43248 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754416Ab2IQMyd (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:54:33 -0400 Received: by pbbrr13 with SMTP id rr13so8959932pbb.19 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 05:54:32 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50571ADF.3000406@windriver.com> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Jason Wessel Cc: Anton Vorontsov , Andrew Morton , Russell King , Alan Cox , Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= , Colin Cross , Brian Swetland , John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, kernel-team@android.com, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:43:11AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote: > On 09/17/2012 06:37 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 08:01:33AM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Here comes the lucky v7: > >> > >> - Per Alan Cox's suggestion added hangup method and removed a small > >> leftover; > >> - Per Colin Cross' suggestion moved IRQ quiescing logic into > >> poll_get_char routine. IIUC, Alan is less unhappy about it. As a > >> result, clear_irq() callback dropped. > >> > >> These patches can be found in the following repo (based on tty-next): > >> > >> git://git.infradead.org/users/cbou/linux-nmi-kdb.git master > >> > >> Old changelogs and rationale for these patches can be found here: > >> > >> v1-v5, rationale: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/10/2 > >> v6: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/10/2 > > I have no objection to these patches, and as they are based on my > > tty-next tree, should I be the ones accepting them? If so, then I need > > a bunch of acks from others involved in the kdb/kgdb code before I can > > do so. > > > > To make it easier, can I just take the tty driver patches now? Will > > that break anything? > > I have not made my way through the entire series yet, so I am not sure > if you need the kdb header changes or not, but so far it looks like > the tty pieces are separate. If you add your ack Greg, I'll take the > whole series and merge it into kgdb-next, or after I finish the review > we could do it the other way around. Your tree is fine: Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Let me know if you have problems merging this due to any tty patches, and if so, I'll be glad to take them through my tree. greg k-h