linux-serial.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	Guillaume Jaunet <guillaume.jaunet@stericsson.com>,
	Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl <par-gunnar.hjalmdahl@stericsson.com>,
	Anmar Oueja <anmar.oueja@linaro.org>,
	Matthias Locher <matthias.locher@stericsson.com>,
	"Rajanikanth H.V" <rajanikanth.hv@stericsson.com>,
	Christophe Arnal <christophe.arnal@stericsson.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] serial: pl011: allow very high baudrates
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:34:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120921203440.GA6796@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120921205603.436a0194@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:56:03PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> If you are calling TCSETS2 passing BOTHER and an actual specific speed
> you should always be getting handed back the speed requested as it'll see
> the BOTHER flag is present and assume the caller is smart.

Is this something that should be handled by glibc?  If so, ARM for
whatever reason still seems to use the standard TCGETS and TCSETS
calls... at least stracing stty in ubuntu precise suggests that's
the case.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-21 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-20  9:46 [PATCH 3/3] serial: pl011: allow very high baudrates Linus Walleij
2012-09-20 19:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-21 13:41   ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-21 14:37     ` Alan Cox
2012-09-21 14:58       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-21 15:05         ` Alan Cox
2012-09-21 15:06           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-21 15:36             ` Alan Cox
2012-09-21 15:14     ` Alan Cox
2012-09-21 15:25     ` Alan Cox
2012-09-21 17:52       ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-21 19:56         ` Alan Cox
2012-09-21 20:34           ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2012-09-21 20:55             ` Alan Cox
2012-09-25 18:48           ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-25 19:00             ` Alan Cox
2012-09-26  8:06             ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-26 10:04               ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120921203440.GA6796@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=anmar.oueja@linaro.org \
    --cc=christophe.arnal@stericsson.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=guillaume.jaunet@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.locher@stericsson.com \
    --cc=par-gunnar.hjalmdahl@stericsson.com \
    --cc=rajanikanth.hv@stericsson.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).