From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tty: serial core: use the ACPI PM state defines Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 19:40:40 +0000 Message-ID: <20121206194040.0c79e7e8@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> References: <1354819612-2401-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20121206193131.33823e02@bob.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:55396 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946556Ab2LFTfg (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:35:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Alan Cox , Linus Walleij , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Len Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rickard Andersson , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 20:31:15 +0100 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Almost none of the platforms using the serial driver even have ACPI so > > this seems to be an obfuscation of a simple numbering system for a > > subsystem specific set of definitions that may or may not fit in future. > > OK so we need to get away from using the ACPI numbering scheme. So whats wrong with 0 1 2 3 ?