Linux Serial subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Philip Oberstaller <Philip.Oberstaller@septentrio.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Printf hangs when internal buffer of driver is temporarily full
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:19:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130114161942.GD14721@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F40403.9040000@septentrio.com>

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:11:31PM +0100, Philip Oberstaller wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm writing a driver for the Exar's XR20M1280 SPI-based serial port
> using kernel version 3.4.17.

We can't take drivers for older kernel versions, why not write it for
3.8 and then backport it when finished?

> If a string, which is considerably longer than the driver's internal buffer
> (512 bytes), is written with printf/fprintf to the dedicated port, then the
> function call hangs after the driver's write_room function returns zero,
> which happens when the driver's internal buffer is temporarily full.
> I would have expected that the TTY layer or the libc implementation of
> printf would requery write_room automatically and thus would notice
> after a while that there is space again, but this doesn't seem to happen.

That's right, the printf call should return a "short" write, but really,
you should use write() and friends for tty ports, not fprintf, if at all
possible to handle this type of error better.

> Eventually the printf function returns after a very long timeout but without
> that the remaining characters have been printed.
> 
> I based my code mainly on the ifx6x60-driver and I looked at other similar
> drivers as well, but I can't see that they are using a different strategy.
> 
> In a dated driver book it was suggested that write_room and write should
> always return at least one. I could use busy waiting in the write function
> until there is space for at least one character, but I hope that there is
> a better solution around?!

I don't think so, sorry.

> This e-mail communication contains information that is confidential
> and may also be privileged.

<snip>

This type of footer really isn't good to have for public mailing list
posts, it directly goes against the fact that you sent this to thousands
of people in a public manner :)

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-14 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-14 13:11 Printf hangs when internal buffer of driver is temporarily full Philip Oberstaller
2013-01-14 16:19 ` Greg KH [this message]
2013-01-14 19:36 ` Alan Cox
2013-01-15 14:23   ` Philip Oberstaller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130114161942.GD14721@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=Philip.Oberstaller@septentrio.com \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox