From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] serial: sh-sci: Add OF support Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:34:40 +0900 Message-ID: <20130227093439.GE30395@linux-sh.org> References: <1361898208-6683-1-git-send-email-hechtb+renesas@gmail.com> <20130227080742.GB21690@linux-sh.org> <20130227081954.GA30395@linux-sh.org> <20130227090456.GA7936@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130227090456.GA7936@verge.net.au> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Simon Horman Cc: Magnus Damm , Bastian Hecht , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 06:04:57PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:26:57PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > > My personal preference would be that you (Paul) merge this patch by yourself: > > [PATCH v3 1/3] serial: sh-sci: Add OF support > > > > I believe we can deal with the SoC bits easily afterwards. Simon may > > however prefer to deal with it differently. > > > > Simon, how do you prefer to handle merge of DT support for the SCIF driver? > > I am fairly ambivalent. > > If Paul could merge this patch upstream in the v3.9-rc1~rc3 time frame > then I can queue up the SoC portions for v3.10. > > Or alternatively I can queue up all three patches for v3.10. > Either way the outcome should be much the same. Waiting an entire kernel version to throw some arbitrary dts file updates in seems a bit absurd, but I'll let you handle it however you like. I haven't sent out my SH updates to Linus yet, but plan to do so by -rc2 (there isn't really that much to begin with, most of it has gone through other trees), so in light of this I will throw the sh-sci OF patch in to my queue directly then.