From: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
To: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
jslaby@suse.cz, alan@linux.intel.com, matts@commtech-fastcom.com,
wfp5p@virginia.edu, tklauser@distanz.ch,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3.9] [v3.10] [Regression] serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:46:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130702044641.GA6549@udknight> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D1AAF5.5050004@canonical.com>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:14:45PM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> Hi Wang,
>
> A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel bisect,
> it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
>
> commit 8d2f8cd424ca0b99001f3ff4f5db87c4e525f366
> Author: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri Mar 1 11:47:20 2013 +0800
>
> serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of NetMos Technology
> PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller
>
>
> The regression was introduced as of v3.9-rc3 and still exists in the
> current Mainline tree. It was also propagated to the stable trees.
>
> The patch causes the device to use the serial module instead of
> parport_serial. Maybe the the quirk in ~drivers/pci/quirks.c
> quirk_netmos() needs to be modified?
>
> I see that you are the author of this patch, so I wanted to run this by
> you. I was thinking of requesting a revert, but I wanted to get your
> feedback first.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
Hi all,
I am sorry for it and later reply.
But I am sure I have included the parport_serial in the
kernel for my consumers at the time they report their
PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller didn't work which cause
this "culprit" patch.
I don't have the card in hand right now, so I can't
dig into it. After stare into parport_serial.c, yes,
it seems like it will handle this pci serial card.
Maybe I forget or miss something, I hope.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-01 16:14 [v3.9] [v3.10] [Regression] serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller Joseph Salisbury
2013-07-01 16:27 ` Greg KH
2013-07-01 18:48 ` Joseph Salisbury
2013-07-02 4:46 ` Wang YanQing [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130702044641.GA6549@udknight \
--to=udknight@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joseph.salisbury@canonical.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matts@commtech-fastcom.com \
--cc=tklauser@distanz.ch \
--cc=wfp5p@virginia.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).