linux-serial.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
To: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	jslaby@suse.cz, alan@linux.intel.com, matts@commtech-fastcom.com,
	wfp5p@virginia.edu, tklauser@distanz.ch,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3.9] [v3.10] [Regression]  serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:46:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130702044641.GA6549@udknight> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D1AAF5.5050004@canonical.com>

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:14:45PM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> Hi Wang,
> 
> A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0].  After a kernel bisect,
> it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
> 
> commit 8d2f8cd424ca0b99001f3ff4f5db87c4e525f366
> Author: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
> Date:   Fri Mar 1 11:47:20 2013 +0800
> 
>     serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of NetMos Technology
> PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller
> 
> 
> The regression was introduced as of v3.9-rc3 and still exists in the
> current Mainline tree.  It was also propagated to the stable trees.
> 
> The patch causes the device to use the serial module instead of
> parport_serial.  Maybe the the quirk in ~drivers/pci/quirks.c
> quirk_netmos() needs to be modified?
> 
> I see that you are the author of this patch, so I wanted to run this by
> you.  I was thinking of requesting a revert, but I wanted to get your
> feedback first.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joe
Hi all,
I am sorry for it and later reply.

But I am sure I have included the parport_serial in the
kernel for my consumers at the time they report their
PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller didn't work which cause
this "culprit" patch.

I don't have the card in hand right now, so I can't
dig into it. After stare into parport_serial.c, yes,
it seems like it will handle this pci serial card.

Maybe I forget or miss something, I hope.

Thanks.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-02  4:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-01 16:14 [v3.9] [v3.10] [Regression] serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller Joseph Salisbury
2013-07-01 16:27 ` Greg KH
2013-07-01 18:48   ` Joseph Salisbury
2013-07-02  4:46 ` Wang YanQing [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130702044641.GA6549@udknight \
    --to=udknight@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joseph.salisbury@canonical.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matts@commtech-fastcom.com \
    --cc=tklauser@distanz.ch \
    --cc=wfp5p@virginia.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).