From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: omap: Add support for optional wake-up interrupt
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:37:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131018163740.GP15154@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131018161916.GF18921@gimli>
* Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [131018 09:19]:
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> > #include <linux/irq.h>
> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > #include <linux/gpio.h>
> > #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_data/serial-omap.h>
> > @@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ struct uart_omap_port {
> > struct uart_port port;
> > struct uart_omap_dma uart_dma;
> > struct device *dev;
> > -
> > + int irqs[2];
> > unsigned char ier;
> > unsigned char lcr;
> > unsigned char mcr;
> > @@ -176,6 +177,8 @@ struct uart_omap_port {
> > };
> >
> > #define to_uart_omap_port(p) ((container_of((p), struct uart_omap_port, port)))
> > +#define omap_uartirq (up->irqs[0])
> > +#define omap_wakeirq (up->irqs[1])
> >
> > static struct uart_omap_port *ui[OMAP_MAX_HSUART_PORTS];
> >
> > @@ -214,10 +217,23 @@ static int serial_omap_get_context_loss_count(struct uart_omap_port *up)
> > return pdata->get_context_loss_count(up->dev);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void serial_omap_enable_wakeirq(struct uart_omap_port *up,
> > + bool enable)
> > +{
> > + if (!omap_wakeirq)
> > + return;
>
> can we drop the pointless obfuscation ?
Hmm care to specify what exactly you have in mind here? The wakeirq
is optional so we need to check for it.
Do you mean get rid of serial_omap_enable_wakeirq() or get rid of
the defines for omap_uartirq and omap_wakeirq?
> > @@ -689,15 +705,25 @@ static int serial_omap_startup(struct uart_port *port)
> > {
> > struct uart_omap_port *up = to_uart_omap_port(port);
> > unsigned long flags = 0;
> > - int retval;
> > + int i, retval;
> >
> > /*
> > - * Allocate the IRQ
> > + * Allocate the IRQs, the second IRQ is the optional wakeirq
> > */
> > - retval = request_irq(up->port.irq, serial_omap_irq, up->port.irqflags,
> > - up->name, up);
> > - if (retval)
> > - return retval;
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(up->irqs); i++) {
> > + if (i == 1 && !omap_wakeirq) {
> > + dev_info(up->port.dev, "no wakeirq for uart%d\n",
> > + up->port.line);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + retval = devm_request_irq(up->port.dev, up->irqs[i],
> > + serial_omap_irq, up->port.irqflags,
> > + up->name, up);
>
> conversion to devm_* should be done as another patch, it seems.
OK, I'll separate the devm_* changes from this patch. It's seems
that we're currently mostly devm_*, so let's do that first.
> > @@ -786,7 +813,10 @@ static void serial_omap_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
> >
> > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(up->dev);
> > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(up->dev);
> > - free_irq(up->port.irq, up);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(up->irqs); i++)
> > + if (up->irqs[i])
> > + devm_free_irq(up->port.dev, up->irqs[i], up);
>
> do you need this at all if you're using devm_* ?
So it seems, startup and shutdown are managed by serial_core and
that's what at least clps711x.c serial driver is doing.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-18 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-17 23:28 [PATCH] serial: omap: Add support for optional wake-up interrupt Tony Lindgren
2013-10-18 16:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-10-18 16:37 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2013-10-18 16:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-18 22:56 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-21 9:07 ` Roger Quadros
2013-10-21 12:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-10-22 13:49 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131018163740.GP15154@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).