From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] serial: fsl_lpuart: add DMA support Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:50:52 +0000 Message-ID: <20140115135052.GG25824@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1389763265-27300-2-git-send-email-yao.yuan@freescale.com> <1389763265-27300-3-git-send-email-yao.yuan@freescale.com> <20140115110537.GA25824@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <15900408.Osb5heuoGi@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:63285 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751664AbaAONvf (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:51:35 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15900408.Osb5heuoGi@wuerfel> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Yuan Yao , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "shawn.guo@linaro.org" On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:17:07AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 15 January 2014 11:05:37 Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:21:05AM +0000, Yuan Yao wrote: > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.txt > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.txt > > > @@ -4,11 +4,24 @@ Required properties: > > > - compatible : Should be "fsl,-lpuart" > > > - reg : Address and length of the register set for the device > > > - interrupts : Should contain uart interrupt > > > +- clocks : from common clock binding: handle to uart clock > > > +- clock-names : from common clock binding: Shall be "ipg" > > > > Why are these now requried if they weren't previously? That breaks old > > dts. I can't see any new code touching clocks. Was this an old but > > undocumented requirement? > > It was previously required but not documented. I asked Yuan Yao to > add the text to the binding along with the new "dmas" addition. Ok. > > It would have been cleaner to do this as a separate patch, but at > the very least it should be mentioned in the changelog. Having it in the changelog would be nice. Cheers, Mark.