linux-serial.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: locking changes in tty broke low latency feature
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:38:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140218093829.GC1741@redhat.com> (raw)

Hi,

setserial has low_latency option which should minimize receive latency
(scheduler delay). AFAICT it is used if someone talk to external device
via RS-485/RS-232 and need to have quick requests and responses . On
kernel this feature was implemented by direct tty processing from
interrupt context:

void tty_flip_buffer_push(struct tty_port *port)
{
        struct tty_bufhead *buf = &port->buf;

        buf->tail->commit = buf->tail->used;

        if (port->low_latency)
                flush_to_ldisc(&buf->work);
        else
                schedule_work(&buf->work);
} 

But after 3.12 tty locking changes, calling flush_to_ldisc() from
interrupt context is a bug (we got scheduling while atomic bug report
here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065087 )

I'm not sure how this should be solved. After Peter get rid all of those
race condition in tty layer, we probably don't want go back to use
spin_lock's there. Maybe we can create WQ_HIGHPRI workqueue and schedule
flush_to_ldisc() work there. Or perhaps users that need to low latency,
should switch to thread irq and prioritize serial irq to meat
retirements. Anyway setserial low_latency is now broken and all who use
this feature in the past can not do this any longer on 3.12+ kernels.
 
Thoughts ?

Stanislaw


             reply	other threads:[~2014-02-18  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-18  9:38 Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2014-02-18  9:57 ` locking changes in tty broke low latency feature One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-18 22:12 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-19 13:03   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2014-02-19 16:55     ` Grant Edwards
2014-02-19 17:38       ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-19 18:12         ` Grant Edwards
2014-02-19 18:42           ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-19 19:17         ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-19 20:22           ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-19 21:42             ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-20  2:19               ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 15:39                 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-21 15:58                   ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 16:31                     ` Grant Edwards
2014-02-19 23:06     ` Hal Murray
2014-02-19 23:35       ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-20  2:55       ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-20  4:16         ` Greg KH
2014-02-20 18:16         ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-20 19:33           ` Grant Edwards
2014-02-20 22:06             ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-23 22:33           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-24  0:23             ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-24 13:23             ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-24 15:44             ` Grant Edwards
2014-02-20 21:55         ` Hal Murray
2014-02-20 22:14           ` Grant Edwards
2014-02-21 15:43             ` One Thousand Gnomes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140218093829.GC1741@redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).