linux-serial.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Muralidharan Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hci_ldsic nested locking problem
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:29:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140320172920.GC2827@saruman.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140320171621.GA2827@saruman.home>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1848 bytes --]

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:16:22PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 04:42:16PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 11:34 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > when 8250 driver calls uart_write_wakeup(), the tty port lock is already
> > > taken. hci_ldisc.c's implementation of ->write_wakeup() calls
> > > tty->ops->write() to actually send the characters, but that call will
> > > try to acquire the same port lock again.
> > > 
> > > Looking at other line disciplines that looks like a bug in hci_ldisc.c.
> > > Am I correct to assume that ->write_wakeup() is supposed to *just*
> > > wakeup the bottom half so we handle ->write() in another context ?
> > > 
> > > Is it legal to call tty->ops->write() from within ->write_wakeup() ?
> > 
> > It isn't because you might send all the bytes and go
> > 
> > 	write
> > 		write_wakeup
> > 			write
> > 				write wakeup
> > 					...
> > 
> > and recurse

then we need updates to Documentation:

Documentation/serial/tty.txt::

|  Driver Side Interfaces:
|  
|  receive_buf()	-	Hand buffers of bytes from the driver to the ldisc
|  			for processing. Semantics currently rather
|  			mysterious 8(
|  
|  write_wakeup()	-	May be called at any point between open and close.
|  			The TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP flag indicates if a call
|  			is needed but always races versus calls. Thus the
|  			ldisc must be careful about setting order and to
|  			handle unexpected calls. Must not sleep.
|  
|  			The driver is forbidden from calling this directly
|  			from the ->write call from the ldisc as the ldisc
|  			is permitted to call the driver write method from
|  			this function. In such a situation defer it.

documentation says ldisc is allowed to call ->write() from
->write_wakeup(). huh ?

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-20 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-20 16:34 hci_ldsic nested locking problem Felipe Balbi
     [not found] ` <20140320163435.GH32692-HgARHv6XitL9zxVx7UNMDg@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-20 16:42   ` Alan Cox
     [not found]     ` <1395333736.22077.32.camel-wU3TRTJX3O1FGiH78xh5akvbDziVy8sZEvhb3Hwu1Ks@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-20 17:16       ` Felipe Balbi
2014-03-20 17:29         ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2014-03-20 17:34           ` Peter Hurley
2014-03-20 17:35             ` Felipe Balbi
     [not found]               ` <20140320173518.GD2827-HgARHv6XitL9zxVx7UNMDg@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-20 18:45                 ` Greg KH
2014-03-20 18:54                   ` Peter Hurley
2014-03-20 17:31         ` Peter Hurley
     [not found]           ` <532B25FC.3070408-WaGBZJeGNqdsbIuE7sb01tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-20 18:11             ` Felipe Balbi
2014-03-20 18:21               ` Peter Hurley
2014-03-20 18:25                 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-03-20 19:01                   ` Felipe Balbi
2014-03-20 19:03                     ` Felipe Balbi
2014-03-20 19:16                   ` Peter Hurley
2014-03-20 19:25                     ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140320172920.GC2827@saruman.home \
    --to=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).