From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] ASoC: fsl_spdif: fix struct clk pointer comparing Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:20:00 +0800 Message-ID: <20150226021958.GD20028@dragon> References: <1424876018-17852-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1424876018-17852-8-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20150226021250.GA6236@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150226021250.GA6236@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Mike Turquette , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, Russell King , Stephen Boyd , Thierry Reding , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:12:50AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:53:37PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > Since commit 035a61c314eb ("clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk > > instances"), clk API users can no longer check if two struct clk > > pointers are pointing to the same hardware clock, i.e. struct clk_hw, by > > Applied, thanks. Mark, Sorry that I did not make it clear in the cover-letter. But the first patch introduces a helper function clk_is_match(), on which all the other patches in the series depend. That said, the patch series should probably be handled by Mike as a whole. Shawn