From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build
 failure
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 22:34:38 +0530
Message-ID: <20160118170423.GA25394@sudip-laptop>
References: <1452363335-2535-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net>
 <20160109182908.GB29967@kroah.com>
 <20160111083536.GB8070@sudip-pc>
 <20160111111101.GA18945@roeck-us.net>
 <5693C553.7050400@windriver.com>
 <5695E207.9080309@roeck-us.net>
 <1452663850.8586.3.camel@perches.com>
 <20160113103246.GB26117@sudip-pc>
 <569D1496.5080402@roeck-us.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <569D1496.5080402@roeck-us.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>, postmaster <postmaster@vger.kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:36:38AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 02:32 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:44:10PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>On 01/11/2016 07:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >>>>On 2016-01-11 06:11 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:05:36PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >>>>>>On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:29:08AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>>>>>On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:15:35AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>>>>If serial/atmel_serial.c is compiled with devicetree enabled, the
> ><snip>
> >>>
> >>>Sudip, one option would be to set up a semi-private mailing list.
> >>>My build tests now have a dedicated virtual host (kerneltests.org).
> >>>I could set up a managed list there.
> >>
> >>Perhaps it'd be better to have something like linux-build-failures@vger.kernel.org
> >
> >yes, much better. But if me and Guenter are the only two members of that
> >list then it will not look nice. :)
> >
> 
> How about just using kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org ? That list already exists and,
> for all practical purposes, has been abandoned.

Great. I am subscribing to it.

regards
sudip