[PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Mans Rullgard]

From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>

The source and destination masters are reflecting buses or their layers to
where the different devices can be connected. The patch changes the master
names to reflect which one is related to which independently on the transfer
direction.

The outcome of the change is that the memory data width is now always limited
by a data width of the master which is dedicated to communicate to memory.

The patch will not break anything since all current users have the same data
width for all masters. Though it would be nice to revisit avr32 plaforms to
check what is the actual hardware topology is used there. It seems that it has
one bus and two masters on it as stated by Table 8-2, that's why everything
works independently on the master in use. The purpose of the sequential patch
is to fix the driver for configuration of more that one bus.

The change is done in the assumption that src_master and dst_master are
reflecting a connection to the memory and peripheral correspondently on all
platforms except 460ex.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans-2StjZFpD7GcAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps-dma.txt |  4 ++--
 arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/at32ap700x.c                | 16 ++++++++--------
 drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c                       |  4 ++--
 drivers/dma/dw/core.c                              | 15 +++++++--------
 drivers/dma/dw/platform.c                          | 12 ++++++------
 drivers/dma/dw/regs.h                              |  4 ++--
 drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx-pci.c                       |  8 ++++----
 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c                 |  8 ++++----
 include/linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h               |  8 ++++----
 9 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps-dma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps-dma.txt
index c261598164a7..c99c1ffac199 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps-dma.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps-dma.txt
@@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ The four cells in order are:
 
 1. A phandle pointing to the DMA controller
 2. The DMA request line number
-3. Source master for transfers on allocated channel
-4. Destination master for transfers on allocated channel
+3. Memory master for transfers on allocated channel
+4. Peripheral master for transfers on allocated channel
 
 Example:
 	
diff --git a/arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/at32ap700x.c b/arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/at32ap700x.c
index bf445aa48282..00d6dcc1d9b6 100644
--- a/arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/at32ap700x.c
+++ b/arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/at32ap700x.c
@@ -1365,8 +1365,8 @@ at32_add_device_mci(unsigned int id, struct mci_platform_data *data)
 	slave->dma_dev = &dw_dmac0_device.dev;
 	slave->src_id = 0;
 	slave->dst_id = 1;
-	slave->src_master = 1;
-	slave->dst_master = 0;
+	slave->m_master = 1;
+	slave->p_master = 0;
 
 	data->dma_slave = slave;
 	data->dma_filter = at32_mci_dma_filter;
@@ -2061,16 +2061,16 @@ at32_add_device_ac97c(unsigned int id, struct ac97c_platform_data *data,
 	if (flags & AC97C_CAPTURE) {
 		rx_dws->dma_dev = &dw_dmac0_device.dev;
 		rx_dws->src_id = 3;
-		rx_dws->src_master = 0;
-		rx_dws->dst_master = 1;
+		rx_dws->m_master = 0;
+		rx_dws->p_master = 1;
 	}
 
 	/* Check if DMA slave interface for playback should be configured. */
 	if (flags & AC97C_PLAYBACK) {
 		tx_dws->dma_dev = &dw_dmac0_device.dev;
 		tx_dws->dst_id = 4;
-		tx_dws->src_master = 0;
-		tx_dws->dst_master = 1;
+		tx_dws->m_master = 0;
+		tx_dws->p_master = 1;
 	}
 
 	if (platform_device_add_data(pdev, data,
@@ -2141,8 +2141,8 @@ at32_add_device_abdac(unsigned int id, struct atmel_abdac_pdata *data)
 
 	dws->dma_dev = &dw_dmac0_device.dev;
 	dws->dst_id = 2;
-	dws->src_master = 0;
-	dws->dst_master = 1;
+	dws->m_master = 0;
+	dws->p_master = 1;
 
 	if (platform_device_add_data(pdev, data,
 				sizeof(struct atmel_abdac_pdata)))
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
index 902034991517..80bdcabc293f 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
@@ -201,8 +201,8 @@ static struct sata_dwc_host_priv host_pvt;
 static struct dw_dma_slave sata_dwc_dma_dws = {
 	.src_id = 0,
 	.dst_id = 0,
-	.src_master = 0,
-	.dst_master = 1,
+	.m_master = 1,
+	.p_master = 0,
 };
 
 /*
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw/core.c b/drivers/dma/dw/core.c
index 03ec88f1c161..8d1b87ff2ac6 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw/core.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw/core.c
@@ -50,8 +50,8 @@
 		 | DWC_CTLL_SRC_MSIZE(_smsize)			\
 		 | DWC_CTLL_LLP_D_EN				\
 		 | DWC_CTLL_LLP_S_EN				\
-		 | DWC_CTLL_DMS(_dwc->dst_master)		\
-		 | DWC_CTLL_SMS(_dwc->src_master));		\
+		 | DWC_CTLL_DMS(_dwc->p_master)			\
+		 | DWC_CTLL_SMS(_dwc->m_master));		\
 	})
 
 /*
@@ -722,8 +722,7 @@ dwc_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dest, dma_addr_t src,
 
 	dwc->direction = DMA_MEM_TO_MEM;
 
-	data_width = min_t(unsigned int, dw->data_width[dwc->src_master],
-			   dw->data_width[dwc->dst_master]);
+	data_width = dw->data_width[dwc->m_master];
 
 	src_width = dst_width = min_t(unsigned int, data_width,
 				      dwc_fast_ffs(src | dest | len));
@@ -815,7 +814,7 @@ dwc_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
 		ctllo |= sconfig->device_fc ? DWC_CTLL_FC(DW_DMA_FC_P_M2P) :
 			DWC_CTLL_FC(DW_DMA_FC_D_M2P);
 
-		data_width = dw->data_width[dwc->src_master];
+		data_width = dw->data_width[dwc->m_master];
 
 		for_each_sg(sgl, sg, sg_len, i) {
 			struct dw_desc	*desc;
@@ -871,7 +870,7 @@ slave_sg_todev_fill_desc:
 		ctllo |= sconfig->device_fc ? DWC_CTLL_FC(DW_DMA_FC_P_P2M) :
 			DWC_CTLL_FC(DW_DMA_FC_D_P2M);
 
-		data_width = dw->data_width[dwc->dst_master];
+		data_width = dw->data_width[dwc->m_master];
 
 		for_each_sg(sgl, sg, sg_len, i) {
 			struct dw_desc	*desc;
@@ -949,8 +948,8 @@ bool dw_dma_filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
 	dwc->src_id = dws->src_id;
 	dwc->dst_id = dws->dst_id;
 
-	dwc->src_master = dws->src_master;
-	dwc->dst_master = dws->dst_master;
+	dwc->m_master = dws->m_master;
+	dwc->p_master = dws->p_master;
 
 	return true;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw/platform.c b/drivers/dma/dw/platform.c
index 26edbe3a27ac..d3e1abcebd7f 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw/platform.c
@@ -42,13 +42,13 @@ static struct dma_chan *dw_dma_of_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
 
 	slave.src_id = dma_spec->args[0];
 	slave.dst_id = dma_spec->args[0];
-	slave.src_master = dma_spec->args[1];
-	slave.dst_master = dma_spec->args[2];
+	slave.m_master = dma_spec->args[1];
+	slave.p_master = dma_spec->args[2];
 
 	if (WARN_ON(slave.src_id >= DW_DMA_MAX_NR_REQUESTS ||
 		    slave.dst_id >= DW_DMA_MAX_NR_REQUESTS ||
-		    slave.src_master >= dw->nr_masters ||
-		    slave.dst_master >= dw->nr_masters))
+		    slave.m_master >= dw->nr_masters ||
+		    slave.p_master >= dw->nr_masters))
 		return NULL;
 
 	dma_cap_zero(cap);
@@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ static bool dw_dma_acpi_filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
 		.dma_dev = dma_spec->dev,
 		.src_id = dma_spec->slave_id,
 		.dst_id = dma_spec->slave_id,
-		.src_master = 1,
-		.dst_master = 0,
+		.m_master = 1,
+		.p_master = 0,
 	};
 
 	return dw_dma_filter(chan, &slave);
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw/regs.h b/drivers/dma/dw/regs.h
index afd340958266..0391f8ff6919 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw/regs.h
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw/regs.h
@@ -249,8 +249,8 @@ struct dw_dma_chan {
 	/* custom slave configuration */
 	u8			src_id;
 	u8			dst_id;
-	u8			src_master;
-	u8			dst_master;
+	u8			m_master;
+	u8			p_master;
 
 	/* configuration passed via .device_config */
 	struct dma_slave_config dma_sconfig;
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx-pci.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx-pci.c
index d19d7f28aecb..01ccc7448313 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx-pci.c
@@ -132,16 +132,16 @@ static int pxa2xx_spi_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
 		struct dw_dma_slave *slave = c->tx_param;
 
 		slave->dma_dev = &dma_dev->dev;
-		slave->src_master = 1;
-		slave->dst_master = 0;
+		slave->m_master = 1;
+		slave->p_master = 0;
 	}
 
 	if (c->rx_param) {
 		struct dw_dma_slave *slave = c->rx_param;
 
 		slave->dma_dev = &dma_dev->dev;
-		slave->src_master = 1;
-		slave->dst_master = 0;
+		slave->m_master = 1;
+		slave->p_master = 0;
 	}
 
 	spi_pdata.dma_filter = lpss_dma_filter;
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c
index 4097f3f65b3b..aa1b5cc7e158 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c
@@ -1473,13 +1473,13 @@ byt_serial_setup(struct serial_private *priv,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	rx_param->src_master = 1;
-	rx_param->dst_master = 0;
+	rx_param->m_master = 1;
+	rx_param->p_master = 0;
 
 	dma->rxconf.src_maxburst = 16;
 
-	tx_param->src_master = 1;
-	tx_param->dst_master = 0;
+	tx_param->m_master = 1;
+	tx_param->p_master = 0;
 
 	dma->txconf.dst_maxburst = 16;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h b/include/linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h
index 03b6095d3b18..b881b978e486 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h
@@ -21,15 +21,15 @@
  * @dma_dev:	required DMA master device
  * @src_id:	src request line
  * @dst_id:	dst request line
- * @src_master: src master for transfers on allocated channel.
- * @dst_master: dest master for transfers on allocated channel.
+ * @m_master:	memory master for transfers on allocated channel
+ * @p_master:	peripheral master for transfers on allocated channel
  */
 struct dw_dma_slave {
 	struct device		*dma_dev;
 	u8			src_id;
 	u8			dst_id;
-	u8			src_master;
-	u8			dst_master;
+	u8			m_master;
+	u8			p_master;
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.7.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt]

Around Sun 24 Jan 2016 19:21:50 +0000 or thereabout, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The source and destination masters are reflecting buses or their layers to
> where the different devices can be connected. The patch changes the master
> names to reflect which one is related to which independently on the transfer
> direction.
> 
> The outcome of the change is that the memory data width is now always limited
> by a data width of the master which is dedicated to communicate to memory.
> 
> The patch will not break anything since all current users have the same data
> width for all masters. Though it would be nice to revisit avr32 plaforms to
> check what is the actual hardware topology is used there. It seems that it has
> one bus and two masters on it as stated by Table 8-2, that's why everything
> works independently on the master in use. The purpose of the sequential patch
> is to fix the driver for configuration of more that one bus.

Not entirely sure what you want to have confirmed here. There are multiple
masters and slaves on the HMATRIX internal bus on AVR32, and the DMA
controller supports up to three simultaneous configurations.

Sounds good to support configuration of more than one bus. I thought we
always did support that? Perhaps it was a non-standard avr32 implementation.

> The change is done in the assumption that src_master and dst_master are
> reflecting a connection to the memory and peripheral correspondently on all
> platforms except 460ex.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>

For the avr32 related stuff:

Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>

> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps-dma.txt |  4 ++--
>  arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/at32ap700x.c                | 16 ++++++++--------
>  drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c                       |  4 ++--
>  drivers/dma/dw/core.c                              | 15 +++++++--------
>  drivers/dma/dw/platform.c                          | 12 ++++++------
>  drivers/dma/dw/regs.h                              |  4 ++--
>  drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx-pci.c                       |  8 ++++----
>  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c                 |  8 ++++----
>  include/linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h               |  8 ++++----
>  9 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

<snipp diff>

-- 
Best regards, Hans-Christian Egtvedt

Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Måns Rullgård]

Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt-BrfabpQBY5qlHtIdYg32fQ@public.gmane.org> writes:

> Around Sun 24 Jan 2016 19:21:50 +0000 or thereabout, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
>> 
>> The source and destination masters are reflecting buses or their layers to
>> where the different devices can be connected. The patch changes the master
>> names to reflect which one is related to which independently on the transfer
>> direction.
>> 
>> The outcome of the change is that the memory data width is now always limited
>> by a data width of the master which is dedicated to communicate to memory.
>> 
>> The patch will not break anything since all current users have the same data
>> width for all masters. Though it would be nice to revisit avr32 plaforms to
>> check what is the actual hardware topology is used there. It seems that it has
>> one bus and two masters on it as stated by Table 8-2, that's why everything
>> works independently on the master in use. The purpose of the sequential patch
>> is to fix the driver for configuration of more that one bus.
>
> Not entirely sure what you want to have confirmed here. There are multiple
> masters and slaves on the HMATRIX internal bus on AVR32, and the DMA
> controller supports up to three simultaneous configurations.
>
> Sounds good to support configuration of more than one bus. I thought we
> always did support that? Perhaps it was a non-standard avr32 implementation.

The DW DMA controller on the AT32AP7000 serves the MCI, AC97, and ABDAC
peripherals.  It appears to work regardless of the values put in the
various master select fields.  Perhaps the topology is hardwired in the
DMA controller and those fields are ignored.  The AVR32 works both
before and after this patch series, the main purpose of which (at least
my patches) is to fix the SATA driver on 460EX.

>> The change is done in the assumption that src_master and dst_master are
>> reflecting a connection to the memory and peripheral correspondently on all
>> platforms except 460ex.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans-2StjZFpD7GcAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> For the avr32 related stuff:
>
> Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt-BrfabpQBY5qlHtIdYg32fQ@public.gmane.org>
>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps-dma.txt |  4 ++--
>>  arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/at32ap700x.c                | 16 ++++++++--------
>>  drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c                       |  4 ++--
>>  drivers/dma/dw/core.c                              | 15 +++++++--------
>>  drivers/dma/dw/platform.c                          | 12 ++++++------
>>  drivers/dma/dw/regs.h                              |  4 ++--
>>  drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx-pci.c                       |  8 ++++----
>>  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c                 |  8 ++++----
>>  include/linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h               |  8 ++++----
>>  9 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> <snipp diff>
>
> -- 
> Best regards, Hans-Christian Egtvedt

-- 
Måns Rullgård
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt]

Around Sun 24 Jan 2016 20:19:46 +0000 or thereabout, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> writes:
>> Around Sun 24 Jan 2016 19:21:50 +0000 or thereabout, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>>> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>>> 
>>> The source and destination masters are reflecting buses or their layers to
>>> where the different devices can be connected. The patch changes the master
>>> names to reflect which one is related to which independently on the transfer
>>> direction.
>>> 
>>> The outcome of the change is that the memory data width is now always limited
>>> by a data width of the master which is dedicated to communicate to memory.
>>> 
>>> The patch will not break anything since all current users have the same data
>>> width for all masters. Though it would be nice to revisit avr32 plaforms to
>>> check what is the actual hardware topology is used there. It seems that it has
>>> one bus and two masters on it as stated by Table 8-2, that's why everything
>>> works independently on the master in use. The purpose of the sequential patch
>>> is to fix the driver for configuration of more that one bus.
>>
>> Not entirely sure what you want to have confirmed here. There are multiple
>> masters and slaves on the HMATRIX internal bus on AVR32, and the DMA
>> controller supports up to three simultaneous configurations.
>>
>> Sounds good to support configuration of more than one bus. I thought we
>> always did support that? Perhaps it was a non-standard avr32 implementation.
> 
> The DW DMA controller on the AT32AP7000 serves the MCI, AC97, and ABDAC
> peripherals.  It appears to work regardless of the values put in the
> various master select fields.  Perhaps the topology is hardwired in the
> DMA controller and those fields are ignored.  The AVR32 works both
> before and after this patch series, the main purpose of which (at least
> my patches) is to fix the SATA driver on 460EX.

DEST_PER and SRC_PER in the DMA controller selects this, numbers placed here
should match the table you most likely found, 9-3.

Wiring the handshake connections is done with the struct dw_dma_slave src_id
or dst_id member, depending on data direction. Configured in the at32ap700x.c
machine code.

It is not hard wired on avr32, as there are not one-to-one configurations and
masters.

>>> The change is done in the assumption that src_master and dst_master are
>>> reflecting a connection to the memory and peripheral correspondently on all
>>> platforms except 460ex.

OK, I have no knowledge about the 460ex.

>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
>>
>> For the avr32 related stuff:
>>
>> Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
>>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps-dma.txt |  4 ++--
>>>  arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/at32ap700x.c                | 16 ++++++++--------
>>>  drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c                       |  4 ++--
>>>  drivers/dma/dw/core.c                              | 15 +++++++--------
>>>  drivers/dma/dw/platform.c                          | 12 ++++++------
>>>  drivers/dma/dw/regs.h                              |  4 ++--
>>>  drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx-pci.c                       |  8 ++++----
>>>  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c                 |  8 ++++----
>>>  include/linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h               |  8 ++++----
>>>  9 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>
>> <snipp diff>
-- 
Best regards, Hans-Christian Egtvedt

Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Måns Rullgård]

Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt-BrfabpQBY5qlHtIdYg32fQ@public.gmane.org> writes:

> Around Sun 24 Jan 2016 20:19:46 +0000 or thereabout, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt-BrfabpQBY5qlHtIdYg32fQ@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>> Around Sun 24 Jan 2016 19:21:50 +0000 or thereabout, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>>>> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
>>>> 
>>>> The source and destination masters are reflecting buses or their layers to
>>>> where the different devices can be connected. The patch changes the master
>>>> names to reflect which one is related to which independently on the transfer
>>>> direction.
>>>> 
>>>> The outcome of the change is that the memory data width is now always limited
>>>> by a data width of the master which is dedicated to communicate to memory.
>>>> 
>>>> The patch will not break anything since all current users have the same data
>>>> width for all masters. Though it would be nice to revisit avr32 plaforms to
>>>> check what is the actual hardware topology is used there. It seems that it has
>>>> one bus and two masters on it as stated by Table 8-2, that's why everything
>>>> works independently on the master in use. The purpose of the sequential patch
>>>> is to fix the driver for configuration of more that one bus.
>>>
>>> Not entirely sure what you want to have confirmed here. There are multiple
>>> masters and slaves on the HMATRIX internal bus on AVR32, and the DMA
>>> controller supports up to three simultaneous configurations.
>>>
>>> Sounds good to support configuration of more than one bus. I thought we
>>> always did support that? Perhaps it was a non-standard avr32 implementation.
>> 
>> The DW DMA controller on the AT32AP7000 serves the MCI, AC97, and ABDAC
>> peripherals.  It appears to work regardless of the values put in the
>> various master select fields.  Perhaps the topology is hardwired in the
>> DMA controller and those fields are ignored.  The AVR32 works both
>> before and after this patch series, the main purpose of which (at least
>> my patches) is to fix the SATA driver on 460EX.
>
> DEST_PER and SRC_PER in the DMA controller selects this, numbers placed here
> should match the table you most likely found, 9-3.
>
> Wiring the handshake connections is done with the struct dw_dma_slave src_id
> or dst_id member, depending on data direction. Configured in the at32ap700x.c
> machine code.
>
> It is not hard wired on avr32, as there are not one-to-one configurations and
> masters.

This is about the SMS (Source Master Select) and DMS (Destination Master
Select) fields in the CTLxL register and the LMS (List Master Select)
field in the LLPx register.

>>>> The change is done in the assumption that src_master and dst_master are
>>>> reflecting a connection to the memory and peripheral correspondently on all
>>>> platforms except 460ex.
>
> OK, I have no knowledge about the 460ex.
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans-2StjZFpD7GcAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>>
>>> For the avr32 related stuff:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt-BrfabpQBY5qlHtIdYg32fQ@public.gmane.org>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps-dma.txt |  4 ++--
>>>>  arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/at32ap700x.c                | 16 ++++++++--------
>>>>  drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c                       |  4 ++--
>>>>  drivers/dma/dw/core.c                              | 15 +++++++--------
>>>>  drivers/dma/dw/platform.c                          | 12 ++++++------
>>>>  drivers/dma/dw/regs.h                              |  4 ++--
>>>>  drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx-pci.c                       |  8 ++++----
>>>>  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c                 |  8 ++++----
>>>>  include/linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h               |  8 ++++----
>>>>  9 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> <snipp diff>
> -- 
> Best regards, Hans-Christian Egtvedt

-- 
Måns Rullgård
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 567 bytes --]

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:21:50PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> 
> The source and destination masters are reflecting buses or their layers to
> where the different devices can be connected. The patch changes the master
> names to reflect which one is related to which independently on the transfer
> direction.

This is patch 3 of a series but I don't have anything else in the
series.  What is going on with the rest of the series - what are the
dependencies and so on?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Måns Rullgård]

Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes:

> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:21:50PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>> 
>> The source and destination masters are reflecting buses or their layers to
>> where the different devices can be connected. The patch changes the master
>> names to reflect which one is related to which independently on the transfer
>> direction.
>
> This is patch 3 of a series but I don't have anything else in the
> series.  What is going on with the rest of the series - what are the
> dependencies and so on?

I give up.  Seriously, this is impossible.  If I don't include everybody
in the slightest way related to any patch in the series, I get
complaints that patches are missing.  If I do, the lists reject it all
due to too many recipients.  What the hell am I supposed to do?

-- 
Måns Rullgård

Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Viresh Kumar]

On 24-01-16, 22:38, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> I give up.  Seriously, this is impossible.  If I don't include everybody
> in the slightest way related to any patch in the series, I get
> complaints that patches are missing.  If I do, the lists reject it all
> due to too many recipients.  What the hell am I supposed to do?

Bcc everyone and mention that in cover-letter :)

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 22:36 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:21:50PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > The source and destination masters are reflecting buses or their
> > layers to
> > where the different devices can be connected. The patch changes the
> > master
> > names to reflect which one is related to which independently on the
> > transfer
> > direction.
> 
> This is patch 3 of a series but I don't have anything else in the
> series.  What is going on with the rest of the series - what are the
> dependencies and so on?

Mark, sorry about that, but in this particular case you may consider
this patch is a standalone one. You are in the Cc list due to SPI
driver small change. This change isn't modifying functionality of the
driver.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Vinod Koul]

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:38:57PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:21:50PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> >> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> >> 
> >> The source and destination masters are reflecting buses or their layers to
> >> where the different devices can be connected. The patch changes the master
> >> names to reflect which one is related to which independently on the transfer
> >> direction.
> >
> > This is patch 3 of a series but I don't have anything else in the
> > series.  What is going on with the rest of the series - what are the
> > dependencies and so on?
> 
> I give up.  Seriously, this is impossible.  If I don't include everybody
> in the slightest way related to any patch in the series, I get
> complaints that patches are missing.  If I do, the lists reject it all
> due to too many recipients.  What the hell am I supposed to do?

Right practice is to CC everyone in cover-letter and mention which subsystem
this is intended to be merged thru and CC relevant folks on the patches.

That gives everyone context and right attention and lesser noise on patches

-- 
~Vinod

Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 914 bytes --]

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:38:57PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes:

> > This is patch 3 of a series but I don't have anything else in the
> > series.  What is going on with the rest of the series - what are the
> > dependencies and so on?

> I give up.  Seriously, this is impossible.  If I don't include everybody
> in the slightest way related to any patch in the series, I get
> complaints that patches are missing.  If I do, the lists reject it all
> due to too many recipients.  What the hell am I supposed to do?

You should normally include at least the subsystem maintainers in at
least the cover letter and cover the dependencies there.  Think about
how this is going to work: if you don't give us any information on
what's going on with dependencies then we can't tell how to handle the
patches - do we need to apply them, only review them or what?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 596 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:35:02AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 22:36 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This is patch 3 of a series but I don't have anything else in the
> > series.  What is going on with the rest of the series - what are the
> > dependencies and so on?

> Mark, sorry about that, but in this particular case you may consider
> this patch is a standalone one. You are in the Cc list due to SPI
> driver small change. This change isn't modifying functionality of the
> driver.

And there's no dependency relationship with the rest of the series?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 12:24 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:35:02AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 22:36 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > This is patch 3 of a series but I don't have anything else in the
> > > series.  What is going on with the rest of the series - what are
> > > the
> > > dependencies and so on?
> 
> > Mark, sorry about that, but in this particular case you may
> > consider
> > this patch is a standalone one. You are in the Cc list due to SPI
> > driver small change. This change isn't modifying functionality of
> > the
> > driver.
> 
> And there's no dependency relationship with the rest of the series?

Yes, in this particular case. To confirm I even rebased locally the
series to be 100% sure.

The complete series can be found in
https://bitbucket.org/mansr/linux-dwc/branch/dwc-sata

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 424 bytes --]

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:21:50PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The source and destination masters are reflecting buses or their layers to
> where the different devices can be connected. The patch changes the master
> names to reflect which one is related to which independently on the transfer
> direction.

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]