From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] dt-bindings: serial/rs485: make rs485-rts-delay optional Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 11:48:32 -0500 Message-ID: <20170628164832.fm3z2emonsa4teiz@rob-hp-laptop> References: <20170626090803.10981-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20170626090803.10981-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170626090803.10981-3-u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: linux-serial-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:07:56AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > There are a few device trees that specify one of the already optional > properties without also having the up to now required property > rs485-rts-delay. Additionally there is no technical reason to require > rs485-rts-delay and that's also what most drivers implement. > > So give existing users and implementers a blessing and document > rs485-rts-delay as optional. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/rs485.txt | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Acked-by: Rob Herring -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html