From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] printk/console: Enhance the check for consoles using init memory Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 18:51:01 +0900 Message-ID: <20170727095100.GA653@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> References: <1500036673-7122-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> <1500036673-7122-3-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> <20170726130804.GB2173@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170727092957.GD3799@pathway.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170727092957.GD3799@pathway.suse.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Petr Mladek Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Matt Redfearn , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , "David S. Miller" , Alan Cox , "Fabio M. Di Nitto" , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On (07/27/17 11:29), Petr Mladek wrote: [..] > > > Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek > > > > Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky > > Thanks for the review. I am going to push the two patches into > for-4.14 branch so that we could get some testing via linux-next. good. agree. how do you think, would pr_warn() be enough for people to notice the wrongdoing or shall we put WARN_ON() there for a while at least? (assuming that people pay more attention to backtraces). -ss