From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] printk/console: Enhance the check for consoles using init memory Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 18:52:22 +0900 Message-ID: <20170727095222.GB653@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> References: <1500036673-7122-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> <1500036673-7122-3-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> <20170714220626.GB10437@tigerII.localdomain> <20170721143253.GA26877@pathway.suse.cz> <20170724020356.GA515@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170727092825.GC3799@pathway.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170727092825.GC3799@pathway.suse.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Petr Mladek Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Matt Redfearn , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , "David S. Miller" , Alan Cox , "Fabio M. Di Nitto" , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On (07/27/17 11:28), Petr Mladek wrote: > > well, the console output is far from perfect, so I can imagine future > > changes ;) > > Sure and we will need to deal with it. Anyway, I still thing that this > check is better than nothing. Even if we "fix" all consoles and move > them out of init section then this check will be useful to catch at least > some future mistakes. yep, let's keep it. [..] > > let's move. to normal section, or to special section. depending on how > > much space we can saved unloading the consoles. > > I agree. We will do or suggest this when anyone see the warning > and ask for help. works for me. -ss