From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] uart: fix race between uart_put_char() and uart_shutdown() Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 17:40:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20180712154015.GC13114@kroah.com> References: <20180706212220.GC3583@cisco.lan> <20180711160744.32074-1-tycho@tycho.ws> <20180712150438.GF22502@kroah.com> <20180712150822.GC13192@cisco.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180712150822.GC13192@cisco.cisco.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tycho Andersen Cc: Jiri Slaby , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Serge E . Hallyn" List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 09:08:22AM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 05:04:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:07:44AM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote: > > > + if (uport) > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&uport->lock, flags); > > > > That's the same thing as just calling uart_port_lock(), why aren't you > > doing that? > > Because the compiler can't seem to "see" through the macros/ref calls, > and I get the warning I mentioned here if I use them: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/6/840 What horrible version of gcc are you using that give you that? Don't open-code things just because of a broken compiler. thanks, greg k-h