From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: msm_serial: Fix XON/XOFF Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 07:51:09 -0700 Message-ID: <20190520145110.7BDAE21721@mail.kernel.org> References: <20190520103435.30850-1-jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190520103435.30850-1-jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: agross@kernel.org, david.brown@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org Cc: jslaby@suse.com, keescook@chromium.org, anton@enomsg.org, ccross@android.com, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, khasim.mohammed@linaro.org, agsumit@qti.qualcomm.com List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Quoting Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz (2019-05-20 03:34:35) > When the tty layer requests the uart to throttle, the current code > executing in msm_serial will trigger "Bad mode in Error Handler" and > generate an invalid stack frame in pstore before rebooting (that is if > pstore is indeed configured: otherwise the user shall just notice a > reboot with no further information dumped to the console). >=20 > This patch replaces the PIO byte accessor with the word accessor > already used in PIO mode. Because the hardware only accepts word based accessors and fails otherwise? I can believe that. I wonder if the earlier UART hardware this driver used to support (i.e. pre-DM) would accept byte access to the registers. It's possible, but we don't really care because those boards aren't supported. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz > --- Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd > drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_ser= ial.c > index 109096033bb1..23833ad952ba 100644 > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c > @@ -869,10 +870,12 @@ static void msm_handle_tx(struct uart_port *port) > else > tf =3D port->membase + UART_TF; > =20 > + buf[0] =3D port->x_char; > + > if (msm_port->is_uartdm) > msm_reset_dm_count(port, 1); > =20 > - iowrite8_rep(tf, &port->x_char, 1); > + iowrite32_rep(tf, buf, 1); I suppose it's OK to write some extra zeroes here?