From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
jacmet@sunsite.dk, jslaby@suse.com,
shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial-uartlite: Fix null-ptr-deref in ulite_exit
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 12:10:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190521101059.GB13612@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190517075502.GE28564@localhost>
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 09:55:02AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:09:31PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> > If ulite_probe is not called or failed to registed
> > uart_register_driver, unload the module will call
> > uart_unregister_driver, which will tigger NULL
> > pointer dereference like this:
> >
> > BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in tty_unregister_driver+0x19/0x100
> > Read of size 4 at addr 0000000000000034 by task syz-executor.0/4246
>
> > This patch fix this by moving uart_unregister_driver
> > to ulite_remove.
> >
> > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> > Fixes: 415b43bdb008 ("tty: serial: uartlite: Move uart register to probe")
> > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c b/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c
> > index b8b912b..2e49fb6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c
> > @@ -867,6 +867,7 @@ static int ulite_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> > pm_runtime_set_suspended(&pdev->dev);
> > pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> > + uart_unregister_driver(&ulite_uart_driver);
>
> This broken. Consider what happens if you have tho ports registered and
> you unbind the first.
>
> Someone else sent a fix for this here
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190514033219.169947-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
>
> That fix also has some issues, but is still better given the current
> state this driver is in.
I'm not taking any of these patches until people agree on what needs to
be done here :)
Why is this driver so "special" it is having these types of problems?
Why can't it do what all other drivers do in this case?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-16 4:09 [PATCH] serial-uartlite: Fix null-ptr-deref in ulite_exit YueHaibing
2019-05-16 14:52 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2019-05-17 7:55 ` Johan Hovold
2019-05-21 10:10 ` Greg KH [this message]
2019-05-23 9:18 ` Johan Hovold
2019-05-23 10:46 ` Michal Simek
2019-05-23 12:31 ` Johan Hovold
2019-05-23 12:47 ` Michal Simek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190521101059.GB13612@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jacmet@sunsite.dk \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).