From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@live.ca>
Cc: kgene@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jslaby@suse.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: samsung: Correct clock selection logic
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:08:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200511100836.GA16828@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR04MB06604E63833EA41837EBF77BA3A30@BN6PR04MB0660.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 06:34:33PM -0700, Jonathan Bakker wrote:
> Some variants of the samsung tty driver can pick which clock
> to use for their baud rate generation. In the DT conversion,
> a default clock was selected to be used if a specific one wasn't
> assigned and then a comparison of which clock rate worked better
> was done. Unfortunately, the comparison was implemented in such
> a way that only the default clock was ever actually compared.
> Fix this by iterating through all possible clocks, except when a
> specific clock has already been picked via clk_sel (which is
> only possible via board files).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@live.ca>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> index 73f951d65b93..9d2b4be44209 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> @@ -1281,14 +1281,14 @@ static unsigned int s3c24xx_serial_getclk(struct s3c24xx_uart_port *ourport,
> struct s3c24xx_uart_info *info = ourport->info;
> struct clk *clk;
> unsigned long rate;
> - unsigned int cnt, baud, quot, clk_sel, best_quot = 0;
> + unsigned int cnt, baud, quot, best_quot = 0;
> char clkname[MAX_CLK_NAME_LENGTH];
> int calc_deviation, deviation = (1 << 30) - 1;
>
> - clk_sel = (ourport->cfg->clk_sel) ? ourport->cfg->clk_sel :
> - ourport->info->def_clk_sel;
> for (cnt = 0; cnt < info->num_clks; cnt++) {
> - if (!(clk_sel & (1 << cnt)))
> + /* Keep selected clock if provided */
Makes sense and good catch.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
I wonder about the s3c24xx_serial_enable_baudclk() which has similar
pattern - is there
testing only def_clk_sel on purpose?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
> + if (ourport->cfg->clk_sel &&
> + !(ourport->cfg->clk_sel & (1 << cnt)))
> continue;
>
> sprintf(clkname, "clk_uart_baud%d", cnt);
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-11 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-09 1:34 [PATCH] tty: serial: samsung: Correct clock selection logic Jonathan Bakker
2020-05-11 10:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2020-05-11 19:40 ` Jonathan Bakker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200511100836.GA16828@kozik-lap \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xc-racer2@live.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).