From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93793C7EE2D for ; Mon, 8 May 2023 11:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233521AbjEHLIq (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2023 07:08:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44782 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233379AbjEHLIZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2023 07:08:25 -0400 Received: from muru.com (muru.com [72.249.23.125]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F84E33D54; Mon, 8 May 2023 04:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C92F28111; Mon, 8 May 2023 11:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 14:08:17 +0300 From: Tony Lindgren To: Ilpo =?utf-8?B?SsOkcnZpbmVu?= Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Peter Hurley , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Andy Shevchenko , Dhruva Gole , Johan Hovold , Vignesh Raghavendra , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] serial: 8250: omap: Fix freeing of resources on failed register Message-ID: <20230508110817.GW14287@atomide.com> References: <20230508082014.23083-1-tony@atomide.com> <20230508082014.23083-2-tony@atomide.com> <9ea78388-86f-736b-e46-b3bc6223ddbe@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <9ea78388-86f-736b-e46-b3bc6223ddbe@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org * Ilpo Järvinen [230508 09:55]: > An unrelated comment to the patch itself, there seems to be somewhat > handwavy and possibly wrong calculation for the pm qos latency. First of > all, I think it would want something based on port->frame_time, and I'm > far from convinced that 64 is right as it matches FIFO size which doesn't > feel correct for a wakeup related time. Thanks for spotting it, good point. I'll take a look at that in a separate patch. Regards, Tony