From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
kernel@collabora.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] tty/sysrq: replace smp_processor_id() with get_cpu()
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 13:52:03 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822085204.2575767-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com> (raw)
The smp_processor_id() shouldn't be called from preemptible code.
Instead use get_cpu() and put_cpu() which disables preemption in
addition to getting the processor id. This fixes the following bug:
[ 119.143590] sysrq: Show backtrace of all active CPUs
[ 119.143902] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: bash/873
[ 119.144586] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x20/0x30
[ 119.144827] CPU: 6 PID: 873 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.10.124-dirty #3
[ 119.144861] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 2023.05-1 07/22/2023
[ 119.145053] Call trace:
[ 119.145093] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a0
[ 119.145122] show_stack+0x18/0x70
[ 119.145141] dump_stack+0xc4/0x11c
[ 119.145159] check_preemption_disabled+0x100/0x110
[ 119.145175] debug_smp_processor_id+0x20/0x30
[ 119.145195] sysrq_handle_showallcpus+0x20/0xc0
[ 119.145211] __handle_sysrq+0x8c/0x1a0
[ 119.145227] write_sysrq_trigger+0x94/0x12c
[ 119.145247] proc_reg_write+0xa8/0xe4
[ 119.145266] vfs_write+0xec/0x280
[ 119.145282] ksys_write+0x6c/0x100
[ 119.145298] __arm64_sys_write+0x20/0x30
[ 119.145315] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x78/0x1e4
[ 119.145332] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x8c
[ 119.145348] el0_svc+0x10/0x20
[ 119.145364] el0_sync_handler+0x134/0x140
[ 119.145381] el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 47cab6a722d4 ("debug lockups: Improve lockup detection, fix generic arch fallback")
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
---
drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
index 23198e3f1461a..6b4a28bcf2f5f 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
@@ -262,13 +262,14 @@ static void sysrq_handle_showallcpus(u8 key)
if (in_hardirq())
regs = get_irq_regs();
- pr_info("CPU%d:\n", smp_processor_id());
+ pr_info("CPU%d:\n", get_cpu());
if (regs)
show_regs(regs);
else
show_stack(NULL, NULL, KERN_INFO);
schedule_work(&sysrq_showallcpus);
+ put_cpu();
}
}
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-22 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-22 8:52 Muhammad Usama Anjum [this message]
2023-08-22 8:56 ` [PATCH v2] tty/sysrq: replace smp_processor_id() with get_cpu() Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230822085204.2575767-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com \
--to=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox