public inbox for linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Dan Raymond <draymond@foxvalley.net>
Cc: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vt: Fix potential read overflow of kernel memory
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 16:48:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202308301646.8397A6A11@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa488b1d-51b2-7b55-7a8d-552306ca16dd@foxvalley.net>

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 05:17:12PM -0600, Dan Raymond wrote:
> In my opinion strlcpy() is being used correctly here as a defensive
> precaution.  If the source string is larger than the destination buffer
> it will truncate rather than corrupt kernel memory.  However the
> return value of strlcpy() is being misused.  If truncation occurred
> the copy_to_user() call will corrupt user memory instead.
> 
> I also agree that this is not currently a bug.  It is fragile and it
> could break if someone added a very large string to the table.
> 
> Why not fix this by avoiding the redundant string copy?  How about
> something like this:
> 
> ptr = func_table[kb_func] ? : "";
> len = strlen(ptr);
> 
> if (len >= sizeof(user_kdgkb->kb_string))
> 	return -ENOSPC;
> 
> if (copy_to_user(user_kdgkb->kb_string, ptr, len + 1))
> 	return -EFAULT;

This would work if not for func_buf_lock. The bounce buffer is used to
avoid needing to hold the spin lock across copy_to_user.

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-30 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-30 16:04 [PATCH] vt: Fix potential read overflow of kernel memory Azeem Shaikh
2023-08-30 17:57 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-30 19:25   ` Azeem Shaikh
2023-08-30 21:28     ` Kees Cook
2023-08-30 23:17       ` Dan Raymond
2023-08-30 23:48         ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-08-31  5:45           ` Dan Raymond
2023-08-31 14:23             ` Azeem Shaikh
2023-09-15  2:56               ` Kees Cook
2023-08-31  5:32       ` Jiri Slaby
2023-08-31 14:21         ` Azeem Shaikh
2023-08-31 18:30         ` Kees Cook
2023-08-30 19:27 ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202308301646.8397A6A11@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=azeemshaikh38@gmail.com \
    --cc=draymond@foxvalley.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox