From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Dan Raymond <draymond@foxvalley.net>
Cc: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vt: Fix potential read overflow of kernel memory
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 16:48:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202308301646.8397A6A11@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa488b1d-51b2-7b55-7a8d-552306ca16dd@foxvalley.net>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 05:17:12PM -0600, Dan Raymond wrote:
> In my opinion strlcpy() is being used correctly here as a defensive
> precaution. If the source string is larger than the destination buffer
> it will truncate rather than corrupt kernel memory. However the
> return value of strlcpy() is being misused. If truncation occurred
> the copy_to_user() call will corrupt user memory instead.
>
> I also agree that this is not currently a bug. It is fragile and it
> could break if someone added a very large string to the table.
>
> Why not fix this by avoiding the redundant string copy? How about
> something like this:
>
> ptr = func_table[kb_func] ? : "";
> len = strlen(ptr);
>
> if (len >= sizeof(user_kdgkb->kb_string))
> return -ENOSPC;
>
> if (copy_to_user(user_kdgkb->kb_string, ptr, len + 1))
> return -EFAULT;
This would work if not for func_buf_lock. The bounce buffer is used to
avoid needing to hold the spin lock across copy_to_user.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-30 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-30 16:04 [PATCH] vt: Fix potential read overflow of kernel memory Azeem Shaikh
2023-08-30 17:57 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-30 19:25 ` Azeem Shaikh
2023-08-30 21:28 ` Kees Cook
2023-08-30 23:17 ` Dan Raymond
2023-08-30 23:48 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-08-31 5:45 ` Dan Raymond
2023-08-31 14:23 ` Azeem Shaikh
2023-09-15 2:56 ` Kees Cook
2023-08-31 5:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2023-08-31 14:21 ` Azeem Shaikh
2023-08-31 18:30 ` Kees Cook
2023-08-30 19:27 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202308301646.8397A6A11@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=azeemshaikh38@gmail.com \
--cc=draymond@foxvalley.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox