From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>,
linux-serial <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tty-linus] serial: Reduce spinlocked portion of uart_rs485_config()
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 06:02:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230922040228.GA9800@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9888a15-d626-d262-203f-b5f49fa4494@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 06:01:41PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2023, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> > @@ -1404,12 +1404,18 @@ static void uart_set_rs485_termination(struct uart_port *port,
> > static int uart_rs485_config(struct uart_port *port)
> > {
> > struct serial_rs485 *rs485 = &port->rs485;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + if (!(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > uart_sanitize_serial_rs485(port, rs485);
>
> There's a subtle change in behavior here, uart_sanitize_serial_rs485()
> memset()s rs485 if RS485 is not enabled but the early return above does
> not.
The two callers of uart_rs485_config() only call it if
(!(uport->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED)).
Adding that early return ensures that the behavior doesn't change.
So I don't quite see why you think there's a change in behavior?
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-22 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-21 14:52 [PATCH tty-linus] serial: Reduce spinlocked portion of uart_rs485_config() Lukas Wunner
2023-09-21 15:01 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-22 4:02 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2023-09-22 4:04 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-09-22 9:30 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-21 15:18 ` John Ogness
2023-09-21 15:23 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-22 4:23 ` Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230922040228.GA9800@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).