From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Vamshi Gajjela <vamshigajjela@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, manugautam@google.com,
Subhash Jadavani <sjadavani@google.com>,
Channa Kadabi <kadabi@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] serial: core: Update uart_poll_timeout() function to return unsigned long
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:43:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023102712-frolic-bush-3d67@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231026135628.2800617-1-vamshigajjela@google.com>
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 07:26:28PM +0530, Vamshi Gajjela wrote:
> From: VAMSHI GAJJELA <vamshigajjela@google.com>
Please use lower case letters like I think you mean to?
Also, where are patches 1/3 and 2/3 of this series? I can't do anything
without them as well.
> The function uart_fifo_timeout() returns an unsigned long value, which
> is the number of jiffies. Therefore, change the variable timeout in the
> function uart_poll_timeout() from int to unsigned long.
> Change the return type of the function uart_poll_timeout() from int to
> unsigned long to be consistent with the type of timeout values.
>
> Signed-off-by: VAMSHI GAJJELA <vamshigajjela@google.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - updated description
> v2:
> - unsigned long instead of unsigned int
> - added () after function name in short log
> - updated description
>
> include/linux/serial_core.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/serial_core.h b/include/linux/serial_core.h
> index bb6f073bc159..6916a1d7e477 100644
> --- a/include/linux/serial_core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/serial_core.h
> @@ -773,9 +773,9 @@ static inline unsigned long uart_fifo_timeout(struct uart_port *port)
> }
>
> /* Base timer interval for polling */
> -static inline int uart_poll_timeout(struct uart_port *port)
> +static inline unsigned long uart_poll_timeout(struct uart_port *port)
> {
> - int timeout = uart_fifo_timeout(port);
> + unsigned long timeout = uart_fifo_timeout(port);
>
> return timeout > 6 ? (timeout / 2 - 2) : 1;
So we are now doing 64bit math? Did that just make things slower?
What bug is this actually fixing? How have you tested this to verify it
works?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-27 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-26 13:56 [PATCH v3 3/3] serial: core: Update uart_poll_timeout() function to return unsigned long Vamshi Gajjela
2023-10-27 6:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2023-10-27 8:19 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-27 11:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023102712-frolic-bush-3d67@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=kadabi@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manugautam@google.com \
--cc=sjadavani@google.com \
--cc=vamshigajjela@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox