From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@bootlin.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, gregory.clement@bootlin.com,
u-kumar1@ti.com, d-gole@ti.com, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_omap: Set the console genpd always on if no console suspend
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 12:54:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231124105455.GV5166@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CX6Z7BRRRECO.3I32FB3Y8Z21G@tleb-bootlin-xps13-01>
* Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com> [231124 10:39]:
> On Fri Nov 24, 2023 at 6:37 AM CET, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Checking the code confirms this behavior. Grep for the macro
> genpd_is_active_wakeup rather than GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP. It gets
> used twice (suspend & resume), both in the same manner:
>
> if (device_wakeup_path(dev) && genpd_is_active_wakeup(genpd))
>
> This means this flag won't have any impact on runtime PM handling of
> power-domains. By the way, other users of the flag enable it at PD
> registration & don't touch it afterwards.
Setting GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP will block deeper idle states for
the SoC most likely.
> There is currently nothing that links the runtime PM refcount to whether
> or not the power-domains get powered-off at suspend_noirq. Should that
> change? Maybe, but it would be a big behavioral change.
For managing GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP dynamically, maybe something like:
device_request_wakeup_path(dev)
...
device_free_wakeup_path(dev)
And those would toggle GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP for the power domain
based on some usage count?
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-24 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-17 13:05 [PATCH] serial: 8250_omap: Set the console genpd always on if no console suspend Thomas Richard
2023-10-23 7:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-10-24 14:53 ` Thomas Richard
2023-10-24 15:24 ` Greg KH
2023-10-23 21:31 ` Kevin Hilman
2023-10-24 4:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-10-24 18:36 ` Kevin Hilman
2023-10-25 6:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-10-31 10:15 ` Thomas Richard
2023-10-31 10:52 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-10-31 17:34 ` Kevin Hilman
2023-11-22 14:47 ` Théo Lebrun
2023-11-24 5:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-11-24 10:39 ` Théo Lebrun
2023-11-24 10:54 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2023-11-28 4:05 ` Kevin Hilman
2023-11-28 4:11 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-11-28 4:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2023-11-28 5:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-11-27 11:22 ` VAMSHI GAJJELA
2024-08-09 19:04 ` Kevin Hilman
2024-08-13 9:00 ` Greg KH
2024-08-13 17:18 ` Kevin Hilman
2024-08-20 9:15 ` Thomas Richard
2024-09-16 14:03 ` Thomas Richard
2024-10-04 19:23 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231124105455.GV5166@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.richard@bootlin.com \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).