From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: Liuye <liu.yeC@h3c.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
"dianders@chromium.org" <dianders@chromium.org>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"jason.wessel@windriver.com" <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
"kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net"
<kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH V4] kdb: Fix the deadlock issue in KDB debugging.
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:58:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240322155818.GD7342@aspen.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5649fa8bfbdb43ea914850794afc6cac@h3c.com>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 07:50:54AM +0000, Liuye wrote:
> >On 21. 03. 24, 12:50, liu.yec@h3c.com wrote:
> >> From: LiuYe <liu.yeC@h3c.com>
> >>
> >> Currently, if CONFIG_KDB_KEYBOARD is enabled, then kgdboc will attempt
> >> to use schedule_work() to provoke a keyboard reset when transitioning
> >> out of the debugger and back to normal operation.
> >> This can cause deadlock because schedule_work() is not NMI-safe.
> >>
> >> The stack trace below shows an example of the problem. In this case
> >> the master cpu is not running from NMI but it has parked the slave
> >> CPUs using an NMI and the parked CPUs is holding spinlocks needed by
> >> schedule_work().
> >
> > I am missing here an explanation (perhaps because I cannot find any
> > docs for irq_work) why irq_work works in this case.
>
> Just need to postpone schedule_work to the slave CPU exiting the NMI
> context, and there will be no deadlock problem. irq_work will only
> respond to handle schedule_work after master cpu exiting the current
> interrupt context. When the master CPU exits the interrupt context,
> other CPUs will naturally exit the NMI context, so there will be no
> deadlock.
>
> > And why you need to schedule another work in the irq_work and not do
> > the job directly.
>
> In the function kgdboc_restore_input_helper , use mutex_lock for
> protection.
It is the call to input_register_handler() that forces us not to
do the work from irq_work's hardirq callback.
It is true that there are mutexes in kgdboc_restore_input_helper()
but if they were the only problem we could change the locking
strategy.
> The mutex lock cannot be used in interrupt context. Guess
> that the process needs to run in the context of the process.
> Therefore, call schedule_work in irq_work. Keep the original flow
> unchanged.
You should answer these questions by posting a v5 with the explanation
in the patch description (otherwise the explanation of how the fix works
doesn't end up in the changelog).
Daniel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-22 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-28 2:56 [PATCH] kdb: Fix the deadlock issue in KDB debugging LiuYe
2024-02-28 12:05 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-01 3:30 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-01 10:59 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-12 8:37 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-12 9:57 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-12 10:04 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-12 10:24 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-13 1:22 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-13 14:17 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-14 7:06 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-14 13:09 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-15 9:59 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-16 2:34 ` [PATCH v1] " liu.yec
2024-03-20 16:28 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-21 2:26 ` [PATCH V3] " liu.yec
2024-03-21 7:38 ` Greg KH
2024-03-21 7:57 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-21 11:04 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-21 11:50 ` [PATCH V4] " liu.yec
2024-03-22 6:54 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-03-22 7:50 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-22 15:58 ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2024-03-23 1:41 ` [PATCH V5] " liu.yec
2024-03-25 16:54 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-03-26 0:47 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-26 7:40 ` [PATCH V6] " liu.yec
2024-03-26 8:22 ` Greg KH
2024-03-26 8:54 ` [PATCH V7] " liu.yec
2024-04-02 12:58 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-04-03 6:11 ` [PATCH V8] " liu.yec
2024-04-03 13:58 ` Daniel Thompson
2024-04-03 22:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-08 1:44 ` LiuYe
2024-04-08 10:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-09 2:03 ` [PATCH V9] " liu.yec
2024-04-10 2:06 ` [PATCH V10] " liu.yec
2024-04-10 3:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-10 5:30 ` Greg KH
2024-04-10 5:54 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-04-10 5:59 ` Greg KH
2024-04-10 6:10 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-04-10 6:15 ` Greg KH
2024-04-10 6:30 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-04-10 7:18 ` [PATCH V11] " liu.yec
2024-04-10 8:24 ` 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH V10] " Greg KH
2024-04-10 8:38 ` 答复: " Liuye
2024-03-02 20:44 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240322155818.GD7342@aspen.lan \
--to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liu.yeC@h3c.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).