From: Dianne Skoll <dianne@skoll.ca>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: N_HDLC line discipline: Race condition
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 10:15:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240521101435.0b6b3420@gato.skoll.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63a5a3c5-8362-4b93-a50e-10c9cdcffdd2@kernel.org>
On Tue, 21 May 2024 12:47:00 +0200
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org> wrote:
> I believe it is a correct behavior after all. As you use pty for
> testing, the "framing" is lost during the pty-to-pty pass on the
> flush to ldisc path (receive_buf()).
That might be what's happening, but I don't think it matches the documentation
in n_hdlc.c. If you read the comment block near the top of the file,
it says this:
* All HDLC data is frame oriented which means:
*
* 1. tty write calls represent one complete transmit frame of data
* The device driver should accept the complete frame or none of
* the frame (busy) in the write method. Each write call should have
* a byte count in the range of 2-65535 bytes (2 is min HDLC frame
* with 1 addr byte and 1 ctrl byte). The max byte count of 65535
* should include any crc bytes required. For example, when using
* CCITT CRC32, 4 crc bytes are required, so the maximum size frame
* the application may transmit is limited to 65531 bytes. For CCITT
* CRC16, the maximum application frame size would be 65533.
*
*
* 2. receive callbacks from the device driver represents
* one received frame. The device driver should bypass
* the tty flip buffer and call the line discipline receive
* callback directly to avoid fragmenting or concatenating
* multiple frames into a single receive callback.
*
* The HDLC line discipline queues the receive frames in separate
* buffers so complete receive frames can be returned by the
* tty read calls.
*
* 3. tty read calls returns an entire frame of data or nothing.
[...] */
Point 2 says that the driver should avoid fragmenting frames, or concatenating
frames into a single receive callback. Doesn't this imply that frame
boundaries should be preserved when you read() data, which happens reliably
when you add a small delay between write()'s?
Regards,
Dianne.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-21 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 21:31 N_HDLC line discipline: Race condition Dianne Skoll
2024-04-25 18:01 ` Dianne Skoll
2024-05-15 10:33 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-05-15 13:42 ` Dianne Skoll
2024-05-15 15:44 ` Dianne Skoll
2024-05-21 10:47 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-05-21 14:15 ` Dianne Skoll [this message]
2024-05-23 8:01 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-05-23 12:44 ` Dianne Skoll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240521101435.0b6b3420@gato.skoll.ca \
--to=dianne@skoll.ca \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox