From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/34] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:21:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304092417.2873893-14-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304092417.2873893-1-elver@google.com>
The annotations for bit_spinlock.h have simply been using "bitlock" as
the token. For Sparse, that was likely sufficient in most cases. But
Clang's capability analysis is more precise, and we need to ensure we
can distinguish different bitlocks.
To do so, add a token capability, and a macro __bitlock(bitnum, addr)
that is used to construct unique per-bitlock tokens.
Add the appropriate test.
<linux/list_bl.h> is implicitly included through other includes, and
requires 2 annotations to indicate that acquisition (without release)
and release (without prior acquisition) of its bitlock is intended.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
.../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst | 3 ++-
include/linux/bit_spinlock.h | 22 +++++++++++++---
include/linux/list_bl.h | 2 ++
lib/test_capability-analysis.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
index e4b333fffb4d..65972d1e9570 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
@@ -79,7 +79,8 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported:
-`raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`.
+`raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`,
+`bit_spinlock`.
For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`),
calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any
diff --git a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
index f1174a2fcc4d..22ab3c143407 100644
--- a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
@@ -9,6 +9,16 @@
#include <asm/processor.h> /* for cpu_relax() */
+/*
+ * For static capability analysis, we need a unique token for each possible bit
+ * that can be used as a bit_spinlock. The easiest way to do that is to create a
+ * fake capability that we can cast to with the __bitlock(bitnum, addr) macro
+ * below, which will give us unique instances for each (bit, addr) pair that the
+ * static analysis can use.
+ */
+struct_with_capability(__capability_bitlock) { };
+#define __bitlock(bitnum, addr) (struct __capability_bitlock *)(bitnum + (addr))
+
/*
* bit-based spin_lock()
*
@@ -16,6 +26,7 @@
* are significantly faster.
*/
static inline void bit_spin_lock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
+ __acquires(__bitlock(bitnum, addr))
{
/*
* Assuming the lock is uncontended, this never enters
@@ -34,13 +45,14 @@ static inline void bit_spin_lock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
preempt_disable();
}
#endif
- __acquire(bitlock);
+ __acquire(__bitlock(bitnum, addr));
}
/*
* Return true if it was acquired
*/
static inline int bit_spin_trylock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
+ __cond_acquires(true, __bitlock(bitnum, addr))
{
preempt_disable();
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK)
@@ -49,7 +61,7 @@ static inline int bit_spin_trylock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
return 0;
}
#endif
- __acquire(bitlock);
+ __acquire(__bitlock(bitnum, addr));
return 1;
}
@@ -57,6 +69,7 @@ static inline int bit_spin_trylock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
* bit-based spin_unlock()
*/
static inline void bit_spin_unlock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
+ __releases(__bitlock(bitnum, addr))
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
BUG_ON(!test_bit(bitnum, addr));
@@ -65,7 +78,7 @@ static inline void bit_spin_unlock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
clear_bit_unlock(bitnum, addr);
#endif
preempt_enable();
- __release(bitlock);
+ __release(__bitlock(bitnum, addr));
}
/*
@@ -74,6 +87,7 @@ static inline void bit_spin_unlock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
* protecting the rest of the flags in the word.
*/
static inline void __bit_spin_unlock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
+ __releases(__bitlock(bitnum, addr))
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
BUG_ON(!test_bit(bitnum, addr));
@@ -82,7 +96,7 @@ static inline void __bit_spin_unlock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
__clear_bit_unlock(bitnum, addr);
#endif
preempt_enable();
- __release(bitlock);
+ __release(__bitlock(bitnum, addr));
}
/*
diff --git a/include/linux/list_bl.h b/include/linux/list_bl.h
index ae1b541446c9..df9eebe6afca 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_bl.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_bl.h
@@ -144,11 +144,13 @@ static inline void hlist_bl_del_init(struct hlist_bl_node *n)
}
static inline void hlist_bl_lock(struct hlist_bl_head *b)
+ __acquires(__bitlock(0, b))
{
bit_spin_lock(0, (unsigned long *)b);
}
static inline void hlist_bl_unlock(struct hlist_bl_head *b)
+ __releases(__bitlock(0, b))
{
__bit_spin_unlock(0, (unsigned long *)b);
}
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 74d287740bb8..ad362d5a7916 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
* positive errors when compiled with Clang's capability analysis.
*/
+#include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
#include <linux/build_bug.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
@@ -251,3 +252,28 @@ static void __used test_seqlock_writer(struct test_seqlock_data *d)
d->counter++;
write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&d->sl, flags);
}
+
+struct test_bit_spinlock_data {
+ unsigned long bits;
+ int counter __guarded_by(__bitlock(3, &bits));
+};
+
+static void __used test_bit_spin_lock(struct test_bit_spinlock_data *d)
+{
+ /*
+ * Note, the analysis seems to have false negatives, because it won't
+ * precisely recognize the bit of the fake __bitlock() token.
+ */
+ bit_spin_lock(3, &d->bits);
+ d->counter++;
+ bit_spin_unlock(3, &d->bits);
+
+ bit_spin_lock(3, &d->bits);
+ d->counter++;
+ __bit_spin_unlock(3, &d->bits);
+
+ if (bit_spin_trylock(3, &d->bits)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ bit_spin_unlock(3, &d->bits);
+ }
+}
--
2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-04 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 9:20 [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 8:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-05 9:13 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 9:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 16:05 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 0:03 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 13:09 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 14:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] rcu: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/34] srcu: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] locking/local_lock: Include missing headers Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 19/34] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 20/34] locking/ww_mutex: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove Sparse support Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Remove __cond_lock() function-like helper Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] compiler-capability-analysis: Introduce header suppressions Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] compiler: Let data_race() imply disabled capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] kfence: Enable " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] printk: Move locking annotation to printk.c Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] drivers/tty: Enable capability analysis for core files Marco Elver
2025-03-05 9:15 ` Jiri Slaby
2025-03-05 9:26 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] security/tomoyo: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] crypto: " Marco Elver
2025-03-04 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-03-04 23:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-04 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-04 11:43 ` Marco Elver
2025-03-05 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-05 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-05 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-06 13:36 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250304092417.2873893-14-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=takedakn@nttdata.co.jp \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox